· Private foundation
Cameron Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $147k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $410k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM | $300,000 |
| NORTH OKC SOCCER CLUB | $200,000 |
| AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME | $109,775 |
| MOUNTAIN-RESCUE ASPEN | $100,000 |
| ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| LEADVILLE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION | $19,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| LUCKY DAY ANIMAL RESCUE OF COLORADO | $10,000 |
| UPPER SNOWMASS CREEK CAUCUS | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL CARE | $3,200 |
| CITY PARKS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| SNOWMASS CAPITAL CREEK CAUCUS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $411k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MRMountain Rescue Aspen Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $120k · revenue +1%
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC4× · 2020–2023 · $44k · revenue +27%
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +66%
Funded once
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundationone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +20%- DCDARTMOUTH COLLEGEone grant, 2023 · $20k
- OOMRFone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…
Improving life in the st. vrain valley through philanthropy and charitable leadership
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
The university of colorado foundation is the portal for philanthropic giving to the university of colorado and is responsible for receiving, managing, and investing the endowments and other gift funds the foundation holds for the benefit…
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Napa Communities Firewise Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Upper Snowmass Creek Caucus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM ↗
- Who funds NORTH OKC SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Mountain Rescue Aspen Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME ↗
- Who funds ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds LEADVILLE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATI ON ↗
- Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Auction Napa Valley Collective Napa Valley ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER SNOWMASS CREEK CAUCUS ↗
- Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lucky Day Animal Rescue of Colorado ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cut it Forward Inc ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM CITY INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cameron Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cameron Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cameron Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.