· Public charity
California Statewide Certified Development Corporation
Cscdc believes in giving businesses the opportunity to grow.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $49,700 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $68,226 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,526 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE DEVELOPMENT FUND | $25,000 |
| BETTER LIFE FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| HEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL | $7,000 |
| YOLO COUNTY CASA | $5,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…
To protect business transactions between health care facilities and provider groups with private investors from excessive government overreach in California through public education and advocacy
Healthy Community Forum for the Greater Sacramento Region operates under the name Community HealthWorks (formally Sacramento Covered), a not-for-profit philanthropic organization, is an innovative leader in developing and implementing a…
Cfc advocates for the rights of california consumers on a broad range of consumer issues.
An alliance of community based organizations to engage, educate and motivate california's electorate.
California CareForce (CCF) brings together volunteer healthcare professionals, community leaders, and engaged citizens to sponsor temporary clinics across California where free dental, vision and medical care is provided to those in need.…
To improve the health care system where all Californians can access appropriate, affordable, quality health care through education and collaboration with all branches of government and key stakeholders to re-design a system of care
DHAF mission is to empower historically disenfranchised communities to activate voters, influence elections, shape policy, and achieve fair political representation in local, state, and federal government.
Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communicare Health Centers and the most unlike its peers is California Statewide Community Development Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
- Who funds YOLO COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds Better Life Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds HEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Statewide Certified Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.