Skip to content

· Public charity

California Cupa Forum

The CALIFORNIA CUPA FORUM was formed to provide a single statewide organization consolidating unified program implementation efforts and representing all unified program agencies with a single voice.

$213k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$265kPublic Safety & Disaster$196kHealth$106kEducation$62kEnvironment$40kRecreation & Sports$35kReligion$9k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $59k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA MONICA FIRE CUPA$58,585
COLUSA COUNTY$45,500
TUOLOMNE COUNTY CUPA$35,000
GLENN COUNTY AIR POLLU$33,041
HUMBOLDT COUNTY H&HS$31,895
YUBA COUNTY ENVIRONMEN$6,649
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CITY OF SAN CLARA FIRE DEPT: $25k → 8%EL DORADO COUNTY EMD: $107k → 8%CITY OF ORANGE FIRE DEPT: $5k → 10%NEVADA COUNTY: $21k → 11%COLUSA COUNTY: $46k → 11%INYO COUNTY EHS: $29k → 11%SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY EHD: $9k → 12%TUOLOMNE COUNTY CUPA: $35k → 14%SANTA MONICA FIRE CUPA: $59k → 14%GLENN COUNTY AIR POLLU: $33k → 14%YUBA COUNTY ENVIRONMEN: $7k → 15%STANISLAUS COUNTY: $33k → 15%SISKIYOU COUNTY EHD: $50k → 16%DEL NORTE COUNTY: $70k → 17%MENDOCINO COUNTY: $19k → 18%HUMBOLDT COUNTY H&HS: $32k → 18%BUTTE COUNTY DPH: $18k → 18%COLUSA COUNTY: $43k → 11%STANISLAUS COUNTY: $17k → 15%HUMBOLDT COUNTY H&HS: $30k → 18%HUMBOLDT COUNTY DIVISI: $9k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 3 repeat orgs$503k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$210k
$370k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COLUSA COUNTY APCD
    2× · 2018–2024 · $89k
  • CO
    COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT
    3× · 2017–2024 · $71k
  • SC
    STANISLAUS COUNTY LIBRARY
    2× · 2017–2022 · $50k

Funded once

  • ED
    EL DORADO COUNTY AQMD
    one grant, 2023 · $107k
  • CO
    COUNTY OF DEL NORTE
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • SC
    SISKIYOU COUNTY APCD
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL DORADO COUNTY AQMD: $106,664 · OtherEL DORADO COUNTY AQMDCOLUSA COUNTY APCD: $88,500 · OtherCOLUSA COUNTY APCDCOUNTY OF HUMBOLDT: $71,270 · OtherCOUNTY OF HUMBOLDTCOUNTY OF DEL NORTE: $69,542 · OtherCOUNTY OF DEL NORTECITY OF SANTA MONICA: $58,585 · OtherCITY OF SANTA MONICASTANISLAUS COUNTY LIBRARY: $49,915 · OtherSTANISLAUS COUNTY LIBRARYSISKIYOU COUNTY APCD: $49,690 · OtherSISKIYOU COUNTY APCDCOUNTY OF TUOLUMNE: $35,000 · OtherGLENN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION DEPARTMENT: $33,041 · OtherGREAT BASIN UNIFIED APCD: $29,104 · OtherCITY OF SANTA CLARA: $25,000 · Other+7 more: $96,408 · Other+7 more
Other$712,719

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Fire Safe Council IncCA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Fire Safe Council Inc · California Air Pollution Control Officers Association · California Fire Foundation · Center for Technology and Civic Life · California Emerging Technology Fund · Public Health Institute · Save The Children Federation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on California Cupa Forum’s filings →

More from the funding graph