Skip to content

· Private foundation

Calftech

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$139
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$126kAnimals$16kHuman Services$14kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$7kYouth Development$6kReligion$3kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$139
Median grant
1
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN TRUCK AND HISTORICAL SOCIE$139
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 5 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$141k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+7%

Still filing today

20%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    AMERICAN TRUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $126k · revenue +32%
  • MT
    MSU TECH HOSPITAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE COMMUNITY VETERINARY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $4k

Funded once

  • NO
    NORTH OAKS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SC
    ST CLAIR COUNTY 4H & YOUTH FAIR
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • AY
    ARMADA YOUTH LIVESTOCK
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
2
Huron Humane Society Inc

Caring for the health and well-being of various animals - mainly dogs and cats.

Animals
3
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
4
Great Lakes Humane Society

Provide for homeless pets, adopt serv

Animals
5
Ogemaw County Humane Society

To improve the welfare of animals in ogemaw county.

Animals
6
House of Hope Animal Rescue Inc

To rescue, maintain, and place domestic animals abandoned in kill-shelters or discarded by volume breeders and to raise funds in order to accomplish our mission.

Animals
7
Angel of Hope Animal Rescue

To rescue and re-home abandoned companion animals. to educate owners on responsible pet ownership.

Animals
8
Humane Society of the Flint Hills

To prevent cruelty and abuse to animals

Animals
9
God's Dogs Rescue

Animal rescue

Human Services
10
Michigan Animal Crew

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance to stray/unwanted animals in the metro detroit area. provide adoption services for families looking to adopt and care for an animal.

Animals
11
Upper Keys Humane Society Inc

Provide care and housing for animals

Animals
12
Humane Society of West Michigan

Our mission is to promote the humane treatment and responsible care of animals in west michigan through education, example, placement and protection.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Pointe Donkey Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greater Hillsdale Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN TRUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $126,131 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN TRUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETYNORTH OAKS ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $10,000 · OtherNORTH OAKS ANIMAL HOSPITALMSU TECH HOSPITAL: $6,551 · OtherMSU TECH HOSPITALST CLAIR COUNTY 4H & YOUTH FAIR: $5,653 · OtherST CLAIR COUNTY 4H & YOUTH FAIRARMADA YOUTH LIVESTOCK: $5,096 · OtherARMADA YOUTH LIVESTOCKIndividual grant recipient: $4,475 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMICHIGAN STATE COMMUNITY VETERINARY: $3,918 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE COMMUNITY VETERI…JACKSON COUNTY 4H FAIR PROJECT: $3,417 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY 4H FAIR PROJECTGODS HELPING HANDS OF MICHIGAN INC: $3,000 · OtherGODS HELPING HANDS OF MICHIGAN …CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $2,199 · OtherMI COMM DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $1,725 · Other+9 more: $3,339 · Other+9 moreLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $3,000 · Human ServicesGREATER HILLSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,250 · AnimalsTURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC: $225 · AnimalsSEVEN PONDS NATURE CENTER INC: $100 · Environment
Arts & Culture$126,131Other$49,373Human Services$3,000Animals$1,475Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN TRUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $126,131 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGODS HELPING HANDS OF MICHIGAN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetGREATER HILLSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCREATIVE MINISTRIES INC: $397 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEVEN PONDS NATURE CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS OF HOPE A FAMILY CANCER FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN TRUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GODS HELPING HANDS OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HILLSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN PONDS NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS OF HOPE A FAMILY CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Calftech funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Calftech. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Calftech?

    Find your warmest path to Calftech through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Calftech’s filings →

    More from the funding graph