Skip to content
Cabell Huntington Hospital Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Cabell Huntington Hospital Inc

To meet lifetime healthcare needs of those served.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$200MHealth$514kHuman Services$176kArts & Culture$121kPhilanthropy$75kCommunity Improvement$40kHousing & Shelter$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$9,375
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WV MEDICAL FOUNDATION$9,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%GOLDEN GIRLS INC: $61k → 18%HUNTINGTON YMCA: $60k → 19%HUNTINGTON YMCA: $30k → 19%HUNTINGTON YMCA: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201M · 4 repeat orgs$418k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$201M
$408k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+50%

Still filing today

50%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marshall University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200M
  • EM
    EBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +44%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015)
    3× · 2017–2019 · $115k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • MH
    MARSHALL HEALTH NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $99k · revenue +97%
  • GG
    GOLDEN GIRL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $61k · revenue +35%
  • KA
    KEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue ×12
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia State Medical Association

The west virginia state medical association is organized for the purpose of providing services to its members, who are all either physicians practicing in the state of west virginia or medical students. specifically, the association serves…

—
2
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
3
West Virginia Health Improvement Institute Inc

The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.

Health
4
West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by serving as its faculty practice plan and providing a full range of business management services to its…

Health
5
United Methodist Foundation of West Virginia Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to create a culture of generosity by raising, managing, and distributing funds for charitable and religious purposes, with a special interest on United Methodist causes.

Religion
6
Valley Health Systems Inc

To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…

Health
7
West Virginia Health Care Association Inc

To promote the general welfare through development and maintenance of high standards of professional care and administration in all long-term care facilities to establish and promote programs of education for maintaining high standards of…

—
8
Marshall University Research Corporation

Charitable education and scientific research

Community Improvement
9
West Virginia University Hospitals Inc

WVU Hospitals WVUH exists to provide a quality healthcare system, including tertiary services, to the citizens of WV and the surrounding region. Equally important, WVUH is committed by law and philosophy to be the primary clinical site for…

Health
10
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
11
Philanthropy West Virginia Inc

Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.

Philanthropy
12
University Healthcare Physicians Inc

Our mission is to improve the health of Eastern Panhandle residents through excellence in health professions education, community service, research, and accessible patient-centered health care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Marshall University: $200,442,313 · OtherMarshall University+5 more: $138,880 · OtherEBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC: $380,447 · HealthMARSHALL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $98,500 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $9,375 · HealthYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015): $115,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN GIRL INC: $60,993 · Human ServicesKEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $65,400 · PhilanthropyMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $20,000 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE TRI-STATE INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterOUR JOBS OUR CHILDREN OUR FUTURE INC: $12,500 · Community Improvement
Other$200,581,193Health$513,322Human Services$175,993Arts & Culture$75,000Philanthropy$65,400Education$20,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Community Improvement$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC: $380,447 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015): $115,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMARSHALL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $98,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $65,400 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGOLDEN GIRL INC: $60,993 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKEITH ALBEE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE RIVER CITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE TRI-STATE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOUR JOBS OUR CHILDREN OUR FUTURE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $9,375 over 1y, 9.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Mary's Medical Cen…Pallottine Foundation…Amazonsmile Foundation
St Mary's Medical Center IncWV15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Mary's Medical Center Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cabell Huntington Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cabell Huntington Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cabell Huntington Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home