How much did C Herman and Mary Virginia grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of C Herman and Mary Virginia’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

hope lodge

2022

children'sinternational

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$250k+5 grants · $6.0M

$1,000,000

Median grant

States reached

$288M

Total assets

Largest grants

University of Georgia Foundation$2,525,871
Jacksonville Zoo & Gardens$1,000,000
The Community Foundation$1,000,000
IM Sulzbacher Center For The Homeless$1,000,000
Ronald McDonald House$509,283
Jacksonville University$150,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 14%. 99% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.3M · 21 repeat orgs$6.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.3M

$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%

Still filing today

33%

32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JU
Jacksonville University
2× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +38%
W
WJCT
4× · 2017–2023 · $100k · revenue +73%
HH
HUBBARD HOUSE
2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +30%

Funded once

UW
UNITED WAY
one grant, 2022 · $20k
YL
YOUNG LIFE OF JACKSONVILLE
one grant, 2022 · $20k
DE
DOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SVCS COUNCIL
one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jacksonville Medical Center Inc

—

The Jacksonville Historical Society

The mission of the jacksonville historical society is to strengthen citizenship through public history education.

—

Museum of Science and History

Operation of museum in jacksonville, florida

Arts & Culture

St Johns Housing Partnership Inc

To provide and improve housing for the low to moderate income residents of northeast florida.

Housing & Shelter

Safety Shelter of St Johns County Inc

The mission of the organization is to offer protection and quality services for victims of domestic and sexual abuse and their minor children in st. johns county, florida through the establishment and operation of a temporary shelter and…

Housing & Shelter

Northwest Jacksonville Community

To promote revitalization of the community through education, planning, housing rehabilitation and new construction.

Housing & Shelter

Jasmine Road Inc

Jasmine road's mission is to offer adult women trapped in a cycle of sexual exploitation and addiction a path to freedom, a haven for healing, and the opportunity to flourish, leading to generational change and the betterment of the…

Crime & Legal

Jacksonville Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the business climate, promote economic development, and enhance the quality of life in the jacksonville area. the jacksonville area chamber of commerce encourages businesses by building relationships to create a vibrant tomorrow.

—

Jacksonville Gardens Inc

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped. regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter

Garden Club of Jacksonville Inc

To connect, inspire,and empower generations to contribute positively to the environment and cultivate our community's sense of belonging.

Environment

Jacksonville Catholic Communityinc

To encourage catholics to develop a life-changing relationship with the lord jesus, sustained and nourished through prayer, scripture, and the liturgy. to witness the power of the holy spirit in the lives of saints and christian heroes. to…

Religion

We Care Jacksonville Inc

Wecarejax seeks equitable access to quality healthcare by advancing and coordinating community-wide compassionate specialty care and wrap-around support for our uninsured neighbors in need.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Womens Center of Jacksonville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

12/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,657,505Education$2,725,871Human Services$20,000Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$4,000Environment$3,500Housing & Shelter$1,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation ForFL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation For · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Green Family Foundation · Gasper & Irene Lazzara Charitable · Jess & Brewster J Durkee Foundation · The Gate Foundation Inc · The Haskell Foundation · The Thomas M and Irene Kirbo · Crowley Cares Foundation · Pga Tour Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation C Herman and Mary Virginia funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RENEWING DIGNITY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 833443382 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on RENEWING DIGNITY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to C Herman and Mary Virginia?

Find your warmest path to C Herman and Mary Virginia through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

C Herman and Mary Virginia

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to C Herman and Mary Virginia?

More from the funding graph

C Herman and Mary Virginia

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to C Herman and Mary Virginia?

More from the funding graph