· Private foundation
C&G Emanuel Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $111k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| HOSPITALITY HOUSE | $20,000 |
| ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| MESSENGER INTERNATIONAL | $17,000 |
| GRUNEWALD MINISTRIES INC | $13,000 |
| DESTINY BUILDERS INC | $11,000 |
| THE COLSON CENTER | $10,000 |
| BRIDGE THE GAP INT'L | $8,000 |
| LIFE IMPACT | $6,000 |
| RELENTLESS MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| SHIC INC | $5,000 |
| THE DEMAND PROJECT | $5,000 |
| NEW LIFE RANCH | $4,000 |
| KINGDOM KIDS HOMES | $3,400 |
| STANDARD MINISTRIES INC | $3,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
38 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES9× · 2017–2025 · $137k · revenue +82%
- ORORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY7× · 2019–2025 · $136k · revenue +34%
- GMGrunewald Ministries Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- TCThe Colson Centerone grant, 2017 · $4k
- ISINDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INCone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +23%
- SISHIC INC ASIAN HEALTH SERVICESone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Religious
Disciple Maker Ministries is devoted to fulfilling the Great Commission through evangelism and reproducing discipleship.
Christian evangelism
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Christian leadership training in Asia as well as orphanage ministry in Myanmar.To call non-Christians to faith in Christ.To build Christians toward spiritual maturity by providing opportunities for growth in faith and knowledge of the Lord…
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Dream Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Relentless Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Grunewald Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Messenger International Inc ↗
- Who funds DESTINY BUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds The Colson Center for Christian Worldview ↗
- Who funds NATION TO NATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE DEMAND PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds CINDIS HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM KIDS HOMES ↗
- Who funds Supreme Task International Inc ↗
- Who funds TULSA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Relentless Ministries ↗
- Who funds IN HIS IMAGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOICE OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds STANDARD MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ABUNDANT LIFE IN JESUS INC ↗
- Who funds Bridge The Gap International Inc ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Turner Ministries International ↗
- Who funds Youth At Heart Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Hern Family Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization C&G Emanuel Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oral Roberts University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.