Skip to content

· Private foundation

C&G Emanuel Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$406kEducation$201kCrime & Legal$165kHousing & Shelter$123kInternational$112kHuman Services$63kHealth$26kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $111k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPITALITY HOUSE$20,000
ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY$20,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES$20,000
MESSENGER INTERNATIONAL$17,000
GRUNEWALD MINISTRIES INC$13,000
DESTINY BUILDERS INC$11,000
THE COLSON CENTER$10,000
BRIDGE THE GAP INT'L$8,000
LIFE IMPACT$6,000
THE DEMAND PROJECT$5,000
SHIC INC$5,000
RELENTLESS MINISTRIES$5,000
NEW LIFE RANCH$4,000
KINGDOM KIDS HOMES$3,400
STANDARD MINISTRIES INC$3,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $2k → 5%Sheltering Wings Center for Women: $1k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $1k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $1k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $1k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $1k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 38 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+23%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $137k · revenue +82%
  • OR
    ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $136k · revenue +34%
  • GM
    Grunewald Ministries Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Colson Center
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • SI
    SHIC INC ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -33%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
2
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
3
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
4
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
5
Disciple Maker Ministries

Disciple Maker Ministries is devoted to fulfilling the Great Commission through evangelism and reproducing discipleship.

Religion
6
Scott Nute Global Ministries

Christian evangelism

Religion
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
9
Knowing Him Ministries

Christian leadership training in Asia as well as orphanage ministry in Myanmar.To call non-Christians to faith in Christ.To build Christians toward spiritual maturity by providing opportunities for growth in faith and knowledge of the Lord…

Religion
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Destiny Ministries International Inc

Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible

Religion
12
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Dream Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Relentless Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $121,800 · OtherHOSPITALITY HOUSEVICTORY CHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $63,000 · OtherVICTORY CHRISTIAN CENTER INCNATION TO NATION INTERNATIONAL: $59,200 · OtherNATION TO NATION INTERNATIONALSHIC INC: $40,000 · OtherSHIC INCNEW LIFE RANCH INC: $27,500 · OtherNEW LIFE RANCH INCLIFE IMPACT: $19,000 · Other+25 more: $149,740 · Other+25 moreGrunewald Ministries Inc: $84,000 · ReligionGrunewald Ministries IncMessenger International Inc: $70,180 · ReligionMessenger International IncThe Colson Center for Christian Worldview: $62,000 · ReligionThe Colson Center for Chris…Supreme Task International Inc: $17,500 · ReligionSupreme Task International …Relentless Ministries: $16,000 · ReligionRelentless MinistriesTHE VOICE OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES: $13,000 · ReligionSTANDARD MINISTRIES INC: $11,300 · Religion+4 more: $20,000 · Religion+4 moreORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $135,500 · EducationORAL ROBERTS UNIVE…DESTINY BUILDERS INC: $66,800 · EducationDESTINY BUILDERS I…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $137,000 · Crime & LegalPRISON FELLOWSH…THE DEMAND PROJECT INC: $27,700 · Crime & LegalTHE DEMAND PROJ…KINGDOM KIDS HOMES: $19,700 · Human ServicesSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesYouth At Heart Inc: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCINDIS HOPE INC: $25,000 · HealthTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $17,000 · Youth Development
Other$480,240Religion$293,980Education$203,300Crime & Legal$164,700Human Services$32,700Health$25,000Youth Development$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $137,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $135,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGrunewald Ministries Inc: $84,000 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetDESTINY BUILDERS INC: $66,800 over 8y, 11% of budgetThe Colson Center for Christian Worldview: $62,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATION TO NATION INTERNATIONAL: $59,200 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetTHE DEMAND PROJECT INC: $27,700 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNEW LIFE RANCH INC: $27,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCINDIS HOPE INC: $25,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetKINGDOM KIDS HOMES: $19,700 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSupreme Task International Inc: $17,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRelentless Ministries: $16,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetIN HIS IMAGE INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VOICE OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES: $13,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetSTANDARD MINISTRIES INC: $11,300 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetABUNDANT LIFE IN JESUS INC: $9,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $5,540 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTurner Ministries International: $5,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetYouth At Heart Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHIC INC ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM-14 CAMP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Grunewald Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Messenger International Inc ↗
  • Who funds DESTINY BUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Colson Center for Christian Worldview ↗
  • Who funds NATION TO NATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE DEMAND PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CINDIS HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM KIDS HOMES ↗
  • Who funds Supreme Task International Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Relentless Ministries ↗
  • Who funds IN HIS IMAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VOICE OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds STANDARD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ABUNDANT LIFE IN JESUS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridge The Gap International Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Turner Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds Youth At Heart Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS16.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Hern Family Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C&G Emanuel Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C&G Emanuel Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oral Roberts University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on C&G Emanuel’s filings →

More from the funding graph