Skip to content

· Private foundation

C&B Hearn Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$75kFood & Nutrition$56kEducation$56kInternational$55kEnvironment$47kReligion$40kArts & Culture$33kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$6,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
HOPE STATION$10,000
EQUAL CHANCE FOR EDUCATION$6,250
NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT$5,000
THISTLE FARMS$5,000
WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION$3,005
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE STATION: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$434k · 12 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$434k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEducationReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THISTLE FARMS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +186%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    4× · 2017–2020 · $55k · revenue +16%
  • EC
    EQUAL CHANCE FOR EDUCATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHRISTIAN MUSIC BROADCASTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +29%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
2
Country Radio Broadcasters Inc

To promote the education and growth of the country music industry with a focus on radio. crb provides seminars for professionals involved in country music and radio that promote the exchange of ideas and business practices across the…

—
3
Country Music Association Inc

1. heighten awareness and grow the business of country music.2. serve as the information and communication center for industry and consumer trends.3. provide a forum for industry leadership to advance country music.4. recognize excellence…

Arts & Culture
4
Nashville Public Media Inc

Nashville banner is a locally owned, community supported, civic news organization. we exist to empower the people of nashville to make informed decisions by providing non-partisan journalism from an independent, nonprofit newsroom. we are…

Arts & Culture
5
Artists in Christian Testimony Inc

Communicate gospel by music and art

Religion
6
Nashville Wine Auction

Nashville Wine Auction engages local and world wine communities to produce wine related events which raise money to fight cancer.

Health
7
The Family Radio Network Inc

The family broadcasts the hope of jesus christ to strengthen and encourage listeners.

—
8
Creative Works

Creative works is organized to accelerate cultural and economic change by focusing on connecting, inspiring and educating the memphis creative community.

—
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
Tennessee Farm Bureau Federation

To develop, foster, promote and protect programs for the general welfare, including economic, social, educational and political well-being of farm people of the great state of tennessee.

—
11
Chinese Gospel Broadcasting Center Inc

Religious broadcasting services to involve christians in professional and media fields to join force in the production of gospel programs for radio and

Arts & Culture
12
Chattanooga Regional Homeless Coalition Inc

To advocate for people who are homless or near homeless, strategically planning for housing and services in the community, maximizing resources and collaboarating with community partners to implement housing and services within the…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Country Music Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thistle Farms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHISTLE FARMS INC: $64,750 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INCHEALING WATERS: $47,000 · OtherHEALING WATERSVILLAGE CHAPEL INC: $27,000 · OtherVILLAGE CHAPEL INCNOURISH: $12,500 · Other+2 more: $7,650 · OtherCompassion International Incorporated: $54,686 · InternationalCompassion In…EQUAL CHANCE FOR EDUCATION: $50,000 · EducationEQUAL CHANCE…NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $43,600 · Food & NutritionNASHVILLE …THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $14,260 · Arts & CultureCOUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HOPE STATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesPORTERS CALL: $4,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN MUSIC BROADCASTERS INC: $12,500 · Religion
Other$258,900International$54,686Education$50,000Food & Nutrition$43,600Arts & Culture$28,260Human Services$14,500Religion$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $64,750 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $54,686 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL CHANCE FOR EDUCATION: $50,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $43,600 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $14,260 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN MUSIC BROADCASTERS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HOPE STATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPORTERS CALL: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL CHANCE FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN MUSIC BROADCASTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE STATION ↗
  • Who funds PORTERS CALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C&B Hearn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C&B Hearn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on C&B Hearn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph