Skip to content

· Private foundation

C and a McDonald Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$615k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$580kEducation$475kReligion$245kHuman Services$135kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kYouth Development$100kPhilanthropy$50kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$300,000
HIGHPOINT VILLAGE$100,000
LUBBOCK ROOTS HISTORIC ARTS COUNCIL$100,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION JAZZ STUDIES$50,000
KLZK LUBBOCK PUBLIC MEDIA$25,000
MUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$10,000
LUBBOCK CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION$10,000
TEXAS GIRLS & BOYS RANCH$5,000
LITTLE SPARKS PRESCH & ABA THERAPY$5,000
SCIENCE SPECTRUM$5,000
EARLY LEARNING CENTER$4,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HIGHPOINT VILLAGE: $100k → 17%HIGHPOINT VILLAGE: $25k → 17%TEXAS GIRLS & BOYS RANCH: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 3 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$235k
$904k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $510k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $125k · revenue 0%
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue -16%
  • EL
    EARLY LEARNING CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k

Funded once

  • LA
    LUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -8%
  • HN
    HOPE NETWORK MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $225k · revenue -31%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Tech Alumni Association

The organization cultivates loyalty, tradition, service, and lifelong relationships. supporting and assisting in the development and increasing of the facilities of texas tech university through (1) encourage & establish scholarships, (2)…

Education
2
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
3
Lubbock Christian School

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man. lcs strives for excellence spiritually, personally, and professionally among…

Education
4
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
5
Texas Lyceum Association Inc Dba the Texas Lyceum

Educational conferences/seminars

Unclassified
6
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

—
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Agriculture Heritage Museum Inc

To preserve the history of, tell the story of, and instill pride in american agriculture and values.

Arts & Culture
9
Lone Star Flight Museum

Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.

Arts & Culture
10
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
11
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
12
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Girls and Boys Ranch; the most unlike its peers is High Point Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUBBOCK ROOTS HISTORIC ARTS COUNCIL: $100,000 · OtherLUBBOCK ROOTS HISTORIC ARTS CO…ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $65,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOLRanching Heritage Association: $50,000 · OtherRanching Heritage AssociationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION JAZZ STUDIES: $50,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION JAZZ STU…RALLS VOLUTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $34,000 · OtherRALLS VOLUTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTCROSBYTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $34,000 · OtherCROSBYTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPAR…LORENZO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $32,000 · OtherLORENZO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTM…KLZK LUBBOCK PUBLIC MEDIA: $25,000 · OtherKLZK LUBBOCK PUBLIC MEDIAOPEN DOOR: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $53,500 · Other+7 moreLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · EducationLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSI…TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE …American Windmill Museum Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Windmill Muse…LUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHE…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHOPE NETWORK MINISTRIES INC: $225,000 · ReligionHOPE NETWORK MI…HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $5,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $50,000 · Philanthropy
Other$463,500Education$400,000Arts & Culture$330,000Religion$225,000Human Services$130,000Youth Development$100,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetHOPE NETWORK MINISTRIES INC: $225,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Windmill Museum Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 91% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRanching Heritage Association: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE NETWORK MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Windmill Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Ranching Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE SPECTRUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen Jones Foundation IncTX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · South Plains Foundation · Terry & Kelly Crofoot Foundation · HDS Foundation · Community Foundation of West Texas · Texas Instruments Foundation · SS Foundation · Welborn-Payne Endowment Trust · Civic Lubbock Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C and a McDonald Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C and a McDonald Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on C and a McDonald Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph