Skip to content

· Private foundation

Byrd Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$215kHealth$188kFood & Nutrition$111kHousing & Shelter$80kCrime & Legal$41kEducation$36kInternational$36kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIT4KIDS$35,000
CROSSOVER MINISTRY$12,500
HEALING PLACE$10,000
CARITAS$10,000
UPRVA$6,000
STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW$6,000
SWIMRVA$5,000
ARTS FOR HUMANITY$5,000
VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,500
OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION$2,500
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$2,000
OREGON FOODBANK$2,000
COLONIAL HEIGHTS FOOD PANTRY$2,000
CENTRAL VIRGINIA FOODBANK$2,000
ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHALOM FARMS: $3k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $3k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $3k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $2k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $2k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $1k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $1k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MA
OR
IN
CA
MO
KY
VA
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$751k · 26 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
2

Total granted

$751k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+109%

Still filing today

77%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +140%
  • TH
    THE HEALING PLACE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +91%
  • AF
    ART FOR HUMANITY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • VH
    Virginia Health Care Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +27%
  • REACH OUT AND READ INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +109%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

—
2
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
3
Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia

Leading the effort to eliminate hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank Inc

The food bank purchases food and obtains donations of food from the united states department of agriculture, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, growers and community members for distribution to people in need in 25 counties and eight…

—
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
7
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
8
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Fredericksburg Regional Food Bank

Feed the hungry through a community wide network of partner agencies and engage our community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed More Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greater Richmond Aquatics Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIT4KIDS: $215,000 · OtherFIT4KIDSSTOP CHILD ABUSE NOW: $41,000 · OtherSTOP CHILD ABUSE NOWMEALS ON WHEELS SERVING CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $13,500 · OtherGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $16,000 · OtherSHALOM FARMSINC: $14,000 · Other+11 more: $64,250 · Other+11 moreTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $100,000 · HealthTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INCTHE HEALING PLACE: $80,000 · HealthTHE HEALING PLACE+1 more: $3,000 · HealthCARITAS: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterCARITASFEED MORE INC: $28,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $11,250 · Food & NutritionCOLONIAL HEIGHTS FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,250 · Food & NutritionVIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK: $2,500 · Food & NutritionART FOR HUMANITY INC: $35,500 · InternationalUP RVA: $16,500 · EducationROOM TO READ: $8,500 · EducationREACH OUT AND READ INC: $3,000 · EducationVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $13,000 · Arts & CultureChildren's Museum of Richmond: $4,500 · Arts & CultureTHE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$363,750Health$183,000Housing & Shelter$80,000Food & Nutrition$52,000International$35,500Education$28,000Arts & Culture$21,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $100,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HEALING PLACE: $80,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetCARITAS: $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetART FOR HUMANITY INC: $35,500 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $28,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUP RVA: $16,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHALOM FARMSINC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $11,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $11,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $10,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLONIAL HEIGHTS FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO READ: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND AQUATICS PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Museum of Richmond: $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetREADING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT DEVELOPMENT: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVirginia Health Care Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds ART FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds UP RVA ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOT SOCCER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM FARMSINC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds COLONIAL HEIGHTS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RICHMOND AQUATICS PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Children's Museum of Richmond ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds READING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Virginia Health Care Foundation ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carmax FoundationVA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carmax Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · The Titmus Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Altria Companies Employee Community Fund · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Robins Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Byrd Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Byrd Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Byrd Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph