Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bydale Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$777k
Granted FY2025still arriving
74
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Environment$938kArts & Culture$713kHealth$340kCivil Rights$320kInternational$295kPhilanthropy$185kEducation$169kPublic Benefit$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $132k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $645k
$10,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF SUFFOLK COUNTY$45,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$30,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$30,000
AFTERWORK THEATER INC$25,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$20,000
ACLU FOUNDATION INC$20,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$20,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC$20,000
THE POINT CDC$20,000
URBAN ALLIANCE$20,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL'S ENVIRONMENT$20,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTRE$20,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LEAGUE OF MA$20,000
CAROLINA FEDERATION FUND$15,000
CONGENITAL HYPERINSULINISM INTL$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $15k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $10k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $5k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $5k → 17%THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $5k → 17%THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $5k → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $5k → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 84 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

84 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
22

Total granted

$3.1M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

85%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • I
    ISAIAH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +86%
  • TH
    THE HUDSON VALLEY WRITERS' CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +11%
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • AI
    ALL IN ENERGY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +64%
  • RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -34%
  • CO
    CAC OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
5
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
10
New York League of Conservation Voters

See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…

—
11
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environment America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Israels Environment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community College Foundatio…Policy Research and AdvocacyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Ymca Youth DevelopmentVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Women & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/98
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,467

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/96
Grantees still filing
61/96
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE HUDSON VALLEY WRITERS' CENTER INC — $95,000 · OtherTHE HUDSON VALLEY WRITERS' CENTER INCThe Point Community Development Corporation — $65,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION — $160,000 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATIONFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $85,000 · OtherFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INCCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC — $95,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SUFFOLK COUNTY …INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE — $60,000 · OtherTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Other+47 more — $806,500 · Other+47 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $70,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DE…ENVIRONMENTAL LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $65,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LEAGUE…Environmental Law Institute — $60,000 · EnvironmentEnvironmental Law In…BETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentBETTER FUTURE PROJEC…CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOU…ENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT AMERICA …ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $40,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LAW AN…Friends of Israels Environment — $40,000 · EnvironmentFriends of Israels E…NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF …ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE ENO RIVER VALLEY INC — $35,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $30,000 · EnvironmentCERES INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentALL IN ENERGY INC — $25,000 · Environment+7 more — $73,500 · Environment+7 moreAFTERWORK THEATER INC — $125,000 · Arts & CultureAFTERWORK THEATER…WINGSPAN ARTS INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureWINGSPAN ARTS INCNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $70,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC R…POETS HOUSE INC — $55,000 · Arts & CulturePOETS HOUSE INCMaine Public Broadcasting Corporation — $35,000 · Arts & CultureMaine Public Broa…VIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS — $32,500 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA CENTER F…FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ACADEMY OF AMERICAN POETS INC — $27,500 · Arts & CultureHellbender Gathering of Poets Inc — $20,000 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $52,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND — $175,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAE…HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA — $60,000 · InternationalHAND IN H…NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC — $45,000 · InternationalNEW JEWIS…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CEN…CONGENITAL HYPERINSULINISM INTERNATIONAL — $90,000 · HealthNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $60,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $60,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $45,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $30,000 · HealthNEW JERSEY RESOURCE PROJECT INC — $70,000 · EducationWE ARE DOWN HOME — $45,000 · EducationADVOCATES FOR A COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC — $25,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationCape Cod Foundation Inc — $15,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Education+7 more — $33,500 · EducationISAIAH — $120,000 · ReligionJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC — $60,000 · ReligionTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $7,500 · Religion
Other$1,476,500Environment$673,500Arts & Culture$572,000International$300,000Health$285,000Education$218,500Religion$187,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAFTERWORK THEATER INC — $125,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetISAIAH — $120,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HUDSON VALLEY WRITERS' CENTER INC — $95,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC — $95,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCONGENITAL HYPERINSULINISM INTERNATIONAL — $90,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $85,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWINGSPAN ARTS INC — $75,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY RESOURCE PROJECT INC — $70,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $65,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetThe Point Community Development Corporation — $65,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE — $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEnvironmental Law Institute — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC — $60,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA — $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPOETS HOUSE INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWE ARE DOWN HOME — $45,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC — $45,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Israels Environment — $40,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC — $37,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMaine Public Broadcasting Corporation — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE ENO RIVER VALLEY INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetVIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS — $32,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE — $30,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF AMERICAN POETS INC — $27,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetADVOCATES FOR A COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCERES INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationBoston Foundation IncTides FoundationImpactassetsincAmalgamated Charitabl…United States Energy …Hopewell FundThe Hyde and Watson F…The Academy of Americ…Clean and Prosperous …New Venture FundPatagoniaorg
The Ford FoundationNY26.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Hopewell Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Academy of American Poets Inc · Clean and Prosperous America · New Venture Fund · Patagoniaorg

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bydale Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Cape Cod Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Orion Society Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines