Skip to content

· Private foundation

By the Hand Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$104kHealth$72kInternational$63kReligion$27kAnimals$17kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$10kFood & Nutrition$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $30,381, the rows itemized in this filing. The $52,972 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,591 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$600
Median grant
4
States reached
$936k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY$24,581
SALVATION ARMY$1,800
GEAUGA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,800
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$600
FOOD FOR THE POOR$600
CITY MISSION$500
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $660 → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $660 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 14 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
66

Total granted

$214k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+32%

Still filing today

50%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsEducationInternationalFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $9k · revenue +17%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +59%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +13%
  • FH
    FLYING HORSE FARMSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +117%
  • SL
    ST LEO CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
3
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance

To marshal and focus the resources and relationships needed to cure fa by raising funds for research, promoting public awareness and aligning scientists, patients, clinicians, government agencies and pharmaceutical companies dedicated to…

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
Celiac Disease Foundation

The celiac disease foundation is the leading global patient advocacy organization committed to accelerating diagnosis, treatments, and a cure for celiac disease. our mission is to improve the health and well-being of the millions of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vitamix Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY: $50,422 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSYSALVATION ARMY: $6,500 · OtherCITY MISSION: $6,350 · OtherVER-A-FAST BTH FOUNDATION: $5,875 · OtherST LEO CHURCH: $5,500 · Other+65 more: $89,732 · Other+65 moreKIDS READ NOW INC: $101,052 · EducationKIDS READ NOW INCGEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $8,230 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $14,263 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $650 · Health+2 more: $525 · HealthFLYING HORSE FARMS: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $7,310 · InternationalCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $5,445 · Human Services
Other$164,379Education$101,052Animals$16,730Health$15,438Recreation & Sports$10,000International$7,310Human Services$5,445

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS READ NOW INC: $101,052 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $14,263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLYING HORSE FARMS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $8,230 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $7,310 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $5,445 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC: $312 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLSEN INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WEIL FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter of Solitude Inc: $125 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS READ NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds GEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shoes and Clothes for KidsOH13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shoes and Clothes for Kids · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization By the Hand Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from By the Hand Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to By the Hand Foundation?

Find your warmest path to By the Hand Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on By the Hand’s filings →

More from the funding graph