Skip to content

· Private foundation

Butwel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$226k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$335kHealth$21kFood & Nutrition$21kEducation$11kPhilanthropy$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CYRIL'S OF JERUSALEM$100,000
SISTERS OF IHM$10,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$10,000
ST CHARLES BORROMEO SEMINARY$10,000
OUR LADY OF CALVARY CHURCH$10,000
NOTRE DAME DE LA MER PARISH$10,000
OBLATES OF ST FRANCIS DE SALES$10,000
HOLY SPIRIT ADORATION SISTERS CONVENT$10,000
ST BEDE THE VENERABLE$10,000
TUNNEL OF TOWERS$10,000
DAUGHTERS OF MARYMOTHER OF HEALING$5,000
GREY NUNS OF THE SACRED HEART$5,000
SISTERS OF THE BLESSED SACRAMENT$5,000
LEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DAUGHTERS OF MARYMOTHER OF HEALING: $5k → 7%AMIGOS DE JESUS: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$289k · 12 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$289k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-45%
+91%

Still filing today

8%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CYRIL'S OF JERUSALEM
    2× · 2020–2024 · $155k
  • SC
    ST CYRIL OF JERUSALEM
    3× · 2021–2023 · $57k
  • FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue -45%

Funded once

  • SO
    SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS DE SALES
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • HT
    HANDMADE TO SACRED HEART OF JESUS
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Priests for Life
Youth Development
3
Little Company of Mary Hospital Inc

In solidarity with the Sisters of the Little Company of Mary, we are entrusted to serve the community through our ministry of Catholic Health Care. We are the empowered laity - the Greater Company of Mary. Rooted in deep heritage of…

—
4
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Our Lady of Mercy Life Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. our lady of mercy life center is a member of st. peter's health…

—
6
Little Company of Mary Hospital Foundation

In solidarity with the Sisters of the Little Company of Mary, we are entrusted to serve the community through our ministry of Catholic Health Care. We are the empowered laity - the greater company of Mary. Rooted in a deep heritage of…

—
7
Franciscan Foundation for the Holy Land

The franciscan foundation for the holy land was established to safeguard human rights and the continued presence of the christian minority in the holy land. the foundation provides christians in the holy land with humanitarian support.

International
8
Calvary Hospital Inc

The mission of calvary hospital is to care for the medical, emotional and spiritual needs of our adult patients with advanced cancer and other life-limiting illnesses. it is the only fully accredited acute care hospital in the u.s. devoted…

Health
9
Dominican Hospital Foundation

The mission of the dominican hospital foundation is to ensure that philanthropic resources are available to respond to and support the changing health care needs of the people within the area served by dignity health dba dominican…

Health
10
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
12
Our Lady of the Lake Foundation

As a supporting organization of our lady of the lake regional medical center, the foundation promotes and supports the religious, health, and charitable activities of the medical center.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Legacy of Life Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST CYRIL'S OF JERUSALEM: $155,000 · OtherST CYRIL'S OF JERUSALEMST CYRIL OF JERUSALEM: $57,000 · OtherST CYRIL OF JERUSALEMCONGREGATION OF THE SISTERS SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART: $14,000 · Other+28 more: $123,200 · Other+28 moreFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $19,000 · InternationalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 · HealthDaughters of Mary Mother of Healing Love: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmigos de Jesus: $1,500 · Human ServicesLEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAvila Foundation Inc: $1,000 · ReligionCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $1,000 · Religion
Other$349,200International$19,000Education$10,000Health$10,000Human Services$6,500Philanthropy$5,000Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDaughters of Mary Mother of Healing Love: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmigos de Jesus: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAvila Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Daughters of Mary Mother of Healing Love ↗
  • Who funds Amigos de Jesus ↗
  • Who funds Avila Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Butwel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Butwel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Butwel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph