Skip to content

· Private foundation

Butcher Family Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of Butcher Family Fund’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Generation Citizen Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’20
3
’21
4
’22
1
’23
0
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$12kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$10kPublic Benefit$10kArts & Culture$6kCrime & Legal$5kHealth$4kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$59k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TELLING ROOM$100,000
GENERATION CITIZEN$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%Through These Doors: $2k → 7%Acre Family Child Care: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine GearShare

To provide access to outdoor gear and know-how through a collaborative, equity-centered approach.

Recreation & Sports
2
The Womxn Project

Through civic engagement, policy advancement and artivism, The Womxn Project takes action to secure reproductive freedom, LGBTQ+ rights and government transparency in Rhode Island.

Civil Rights
3
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
4
Connecticut Community Bicycle Workshop Inc

Ccbw promotes environmental, economic and racial equity through bike riding, repair and education.

Human Services
5
The Well Ne

The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…

Health
6
Burlington Bicycle Project Corp

To build community and opportunity through access to bicycles.

Human Services
7
Squannacook Greenways

Squannacook Greenways' goal is to build, maintain, and promote the Squannacook River Rail Trail (SRRT) as a source of recreation and safe non-motorized transportation. The Squannacook River Rail Trail is a proposed conversion of…

Recreation & Sports
8
Mabel Wadsworth Women's Health Ctr

Mabel wadsworth women's healthcare center provides educational and clinical services in sexual and reproductive health care to women regardless of age, race or ethnicity, sexual orientation, or economic status.

Health
9
Women's Institute for Housing and Economic Development Inc

The mission of the women's institute is to promote economic resilience and stable homes by developing and preserving high quality affordable and supportive housing, with an emphasis on under-served populations.

—
10
Bicycle Coalition of Maine

To make maine better for bicycling and walking through promotion, education, legislation, advocacy and encouragement.

Recreation & Sports
11
Abbe Museum

To illuminate and advance greater understanding of and support forWabanaki Nations heritage, living cultures, and homelands.

Arts & Culture
12
Ketcha Outdoors

To provide equitable access to outdoor experiences and gear, promoting well-being, sustainability and resilient communities.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Through These Doors; the most unlike its peers is Portland Trails. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENERATION CITIZEN INC: $109,800 · Youth DevelopmentGENERATION CITIZEN INCThe Telling Room: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Telling RoomLowell Community Health: $6,000 · OtherLowell Communi…SEAMACC: $6,000 · OtherSEAMACCTHE BIKE CONNECTOR INC: $4,000 · OtherTHE BIKE CONNE…Refoundary: $4,000 · OtherRefoundaryTeens in Print co Write Boston: $3,800 · OtherTeens in Print…Dream Defenders Education Fund: $2,500 · OtherDream Defender…Individual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual gra…Color of Change: $2,500 · OtherColor of Chang…EDGE OUTDOORS: $2,000 · OtherEDGE OUTDOORS+1 more: $600 · OtherRobbins House Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE: $4,000 · HealthTHROUGH THESE DOORS: $2,000 · Human ServicesACRE FAMILY CHILD CARE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPORTLAND TRAILS: $3,800 · Environment
Youth Development$209,800Other$33,900Arts & Culture$6,000Health$4,000Human Services$4,000Environment$3,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENERATION CITIZEN INC: $109,800 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetThe Telling Room: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetRobbins House Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE BIKE CONNECTOR INC: $4,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORTLAND TRAILS: $3,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHROUGH THESE DOORS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACRE FAMILY CHILD CARE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Butcher Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Butcher Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Acre Family Child Care Inc: 45% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Butcher Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to Butcher Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Butcher Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph