· Private foundation
Bunge Tom F Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY | $10,000 |
| INDIANA TEEN CHALLENGE | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC | $10,000 |
| UNITED RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY ST JOSEPH CNT | $5,000 |
| LIFE TREATMENT CENTERS INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY4× · 2018–2024 · $55k · revenue +147%
- ITINDIANA TEEN CHALLENGE INC2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +2%
- TLTHE LGBTQ CENTER INC4× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- IHINTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK OFone grant, 2024 · $10k
VISTA MARIAone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +14%- HFHOOSIERS FEEDING THE HUNGRY INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
Assisting and housing females in recovery
To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.
Marys house mission is to provide transitional living environment which provides residential care, individual and group counceling, assessment
Mission to provide housing and services to overcome homelessness and addiction vision a community where a pathway toward self-sufficiency exists for women, children and families values dwc is faithful to our mission by providing a…
Faith based residential program that will provide a safe environment for women to be transformed from teh inside out. a place that helps women bring order, accountability, and a strong spiritual foundation where there has been chaos, lack…
Transitional housing homeless shelter and feeding substance abuse recovery
To honor the dignity, restore hope and create lasting change for homeless and those at risk in the green bay area.
Emergency shelter for homeless
Mercy housing and shelter corporation provides housing assistance and supportive services to persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. mercy works to empower its clients to become independent, so they may live and work with…
Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Margarets House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INDIANA TEEN CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LGBTQ CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE TREATMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
- Who funds HOOSIERS FEEDING THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW DAY INTAKE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds St Margarets House ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · The Pokagon Fund Inc · Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn · Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Fields Foundation Irr Tua · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bunge Tom F Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.