· Private foundation
Buhler Kapsalis Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $97k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASCENSION OF OUR LORD GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $64,812 |
| PANHELLENIC SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $47,150 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX METROPOLIS OF CHICAGO | $10,000 |
| THE ARCHBISHOP IAKOVOS LEADERSHIP 100 FUND | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN HELLENIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HELLENIC AMERICAN ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH BARTHOLOMEW FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HOLY MONASTERY OF THE ASCENSION | $5,000 |
| HELLENIC BAR ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS | $5,000 |
| GREEK AMERICAN REHABILITATION & CARE CENTRE INC | $3,500 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS | $2,111 |
| MICHAEL SKOUBIS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| NATIONAL HELLENIC STUDENT ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| COUNTING CORAL FOUNDATION | $1,023 |
| SAINT TABITHA HOME | $1,019 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AHAMERICAN HELLENIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +94%
- GAGREEK AMERICAN REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTRE2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +12%
- OVORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPS2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +373%
Funded once
- HMHOLY MONASTERY OF PANAGIA KALYVIANO PYRGIOTISSISone grant, 2021 · $11k
- HIHELLENIC INITIATIVE INCone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +1%
- SIST IAKOVOS RETREAT CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote greek music, arts and culture
How this is measured
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Panhellenic Scholarship Foundation ↗
- Who funds Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HELLENIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds National Hellenic Museum ↗
- Who funds HELLENIC INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL SKOUBIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREEK AMERICAN REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds SCULPTURE MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOSEPH PETER BARTZIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPS ↗
- Who funds HIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Washington Oxi Day Foundation ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gianaras Foundation · Metropoulos Family Foundation · The John P Calamos Foundation · Hellenic Foundation · The James & Theodore Pedas Family Foundation Inc · Nicholas J and Anna K Bouras Foundation Inc · The John C Kulis Charitable Foundation · The George and Judy Marcus Family Foundation II · Greek American Restaurant Association · Vranas Family Foundation Co John P Vranas · Cathy and George Sakellaris Family Foundation · The Renaissance Fund NFP
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Buhler Kapsalis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Buhler Kapsalis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Buhler Kapsalis Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Buhler Kapsalis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Buhler Kapsalis Family’s filings →