· Private foundation
Buchanan-Clements Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES | $8,132 |
| HAPPY HOLLOW CHILDRENS CAMP | $3,766 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $3,000 |
| CAT WELFARE ASSOCIATION | $1,910 |
| DAILY NEEDS ASSISTANCE | $510 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFAMILY SERVICES INC4× · 2017–2020 · $27k · revenue +2%
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS3× · 2022–2025 · $13k
- WIWILDCARE INC2× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- PCPLAIN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2018 · $6k
- CGCENTER GROVE WRESTLING CLUB INCone grant, 2017 · $5k
- PCPLAIN CITY PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…
Rehabilitation of wildlife. injured and abused wildlife are taken into the facility to nurse them back to their former condition. these animals are then acclamated back into their surroundings if their condition warrants the change.
Wildlife rescue and rehabilitation service providing free service to the public. Also providing education programs and conservation intitiatives
To improve the quality of life in our region through education and public awareness of our native wildlife and rehabilitating sick injured and orphaned wildlife and returning them to the wild.
Licensed organization dedicated to caring for injured, orphaned, sick and displaced wildlife for the purpose of releasing them back into the wild.
To provide and to promote humane treatment toward animals
Welfare and care of animals
Rescue and rehabilitation of ky wildlife
Rehabilitation and release of distressed wildlife and the promotion of responsible attitudes about the preservation of native species habitat and the environment
To provide family and individual counseling
To provide shelter and care for homeless and abandonded animals, to provide low cost pet spay/neuter certificates to residents of dubois county and surrounding counties, to promote shelter animals to find permanent homes, and to…
Non-profit organization assists in the development and conservation of wildlife preserves, introduces wildlife into new habitats and provides education opportunities for adults and children on the values of sharing our homeland with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service of Bartholomew County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wildcare Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WILDCARE INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES ↗
- Who funds SAVE A WARRIOR INC ↗
- Who funds COAH CONSERVATION INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds Family Service of Bartholomew County Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WILDERNESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER GROVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bartholomew County Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Daily Needs Assistance Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Clarence E Custer and Inez R Custer · McKesson Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Buchanan-Clements Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Buchanan-Clements Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Buchanan-Clements Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.