Skip to content

· Public charity

Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc

Raise funds for disadvantaged persons or organizations.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$407kHealth$66kPhilanthropy$53kEducation$21kFood & Nutrition$11kRecreation & Sports$8kHousing & Shelter$6k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $29,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $114,911 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $85,161 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$208k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY$7,500
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$6,250
STILL CREEK RANCH$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $268k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%BRAZOS VALLEY CARES: $13k → 22%BRAZOS VALLEY CARES: $12k → 22%BRAZOS VALLEY CARES: $11k → 22%BRAZOS VALLEY CARES: $11k → 22%BRAZOS VALLEY CARES: $8k → 22%STILL CREEK RANCH: $15k → 22%BRAZOS LIONS CLUBS FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%STILL CREEK RANCH: $15k → 22%BRAZOS VALLEY CARES: $8k → 22%STILL CREEK RANCH: $15k → 22%STILL CREEK RANCH: $15k → 22%STILL CREEK RANCH: $10k → 22%STILL CREEK RANCH: $6k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $16k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $16k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $15k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $15k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $15k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $10k → 22%HOSPICE OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $8k → 22%JUNCTION 505 FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%JUNCTION 505 FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%JUNCTION 505 FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$495k · 12 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$495k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+28%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $76k · revenue +83%
  • TC
    Twin City Mission
    7× · 2017–2023 · $76k · revenue +35%
  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $62k · revenue +489%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +28%
  • DS
    DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF BRAZOS VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridge Ministries of Bryan Texas

To share Christ with others through serving those in need in the brazos valley and surrounding areas or wherever God leads and to bridge the gap by joining churches and other groups in serving together.

Religion
2
Brazos Valley Affordable Housing Corporation

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…

Community Improvement
3
United Way of the Brazos Valley

The United Way of the Brazos Valley brings the community together to find solutions that change people's lives. UWBV will be the community leader and trusted partner that proactively seeks solutions to community-wide issues.

Philanthropy
4
Brazos Valley Cdc Inc

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our communities in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in…

Housing & Shelter
5
Hospice Brazos Valley Living Endowment

To ensure that the services provided by Hospice Brazos Valley will continue in the communities we serve. Contributors to the Hospice Brazos Valley Living Endowment are ensuring the continuance of Hospice Brazos Valley far beyond their…

Health
6
Brazos Valley Council on Alcohol and Substance Abuse

To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.

Health
7
Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History

To stimulate understanding of natural and cultural history, and to encourage responsible stewardship of all natural resources.

Arts & Culture
8
Brazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic

To provide community-centered prenatal care and health education to medically indigent pregnant women in the Brazos Valley. Comprehensive, accessible and affordable prenatal care and health education are the best ways to improve pregnancy…

Health
9
Texas Non-Profit Hospice Alliance

The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.

Human Services
10
Brazos Employment Enterprises Dba the Bee Community

To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
11
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
12
Hays County Food Bank

To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Brazos Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hospice Brazos Valley Inc: $94,800 · Human ServicesHospice Brazos Valley IncStill Creek Boys Ranch Inc: $76,000 · Human ServicesStill Creek Boys Ranch IncBRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC: $61,900 · Human ServicesBRAZOS VALLEY CARES INCUnity Partners: $30,100 · Human ServicesUnity PartnersJunction 505 Foundation: $27,500 · Human ServicesJunction 505 Foundation+1 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesTwin City Mission: $76,000 · OtherTwin City MissionCHI ST JOSEPH FOUNDATION: $27,500 · OtherCHI ST JOSEPH FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $12,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPHOEBE'S HOMETWIN CITY MISSION: $10,000 · OtherPHOEBE'S HOMETWIN CITY MISSIONFUN FOR ALL PLAYGROUND: $10,000 · OtherFUN FOR ALL PLAYGROUNDIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRYAN FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC - LT GREG PICKARD MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT: $7,500 · OtherSLEEP IN HEAVELY PEACE: $6,000 · OtherBCS HABITAT FOR HUMANITIES: $5,500 · OtherHealth for All Inc: $35,000 · HealthHealth for…DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $10,500 · HealthDOWN SYNDR…BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $5,000 · HealthBRAZOS VAL…RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTexas A&M Foundation: $21,250 · EducationBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $11,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$297,800Other$165,000Health$50,500Philanthropy$25,000Education$21,250Food & Nutrition$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $94,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetStill Creek Boys Ranch Inc: $76,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTwin City Mission: $76,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC: $61,900 over 7y, 22% of budgetHealth for All Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetUnity Partners: $30,100 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetJunction 505 Foundation: $27,500 over 3y, 22% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $21,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $10,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetBRAZOS LIONS CLUBS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
  • Who funds Unity Partners ↗
  • Who funds Junction 505 Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF BRAZOS VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS LIONS CLUBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nina Heard Astin Charitable TrustMO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Orr James Donald Charitable Trust · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation · Virginia & Christian Groneman Charitable · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · Tyrous R & Ruth F Williams Charitable Tr · The John & Sally Godfrey Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bubba Moore Memorial Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph