· Public charity
Bryan Medical Center
To provide excellent care and promote health with a focus on quality, collaboration, and compassion.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $455,617 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $565,423 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $109,806 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
- $250k+1 grant · $347k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRYAN FOUNDATION | $346,567 |
| CLINIC WITH A HEART | $27,200 |
| MADONNA FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MALONE COMMUNITY CENTER | $13,050 |
| CIVIC NEBRASKA | $10,000 |
| NEBRASKA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| PROJECT PINK'D | $9,000 |
| HEARTLAND CANCER FOUNDATION | $8,600 |
| LINCOLN LANCASTER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $6,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $353k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CWCLINIC WITH A HEART INC8× · 2017–2024 · $194k · revenue +17%
- TMTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +87%
- MCMALONE COMMUNITY CENTER7× · 2017–2024 · $87k · revenue ×20
Funded once
- TFTHE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2020 · $101k · revenue -36%
- SFSENIORS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $33k · revenue -75%
- LPLincoln Police Departmentone grant, 2018 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
Community development in lincoln, ne
Building strong communities through access to quality affordable patient centered healthcare to the medically underserved population of Lincoln County, Montana in accordance with requirements set forth in 42 U.S.C. 254C(C)(3)(G).
The nebraska coalition for life saving cures promotes, supports and advocates for research to advance our quality of life and our economy.
Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.
To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.
To provide family practice training and, in support of that end, relevant healthcare education and services.
LincolnHealth is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health of our communities by assuring: the very best, highest quality, and compassionate health care services from highly trained professionals; our services are cost-effective…
Providing advanced life service level support for nine local communities in lincoln county including damariscotta, newcastle, bremen, bristol, south bristol, nobleboro, jefferson and edgecomb
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Civic Nebraska and the most unlike its peers is Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 33. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Bryan Foundation ↗
- Who funds CLINIC WITH A HEART INC ↗
- Who funds THE MADONNA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOURNING HOPE ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds MALONE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SENIORS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PARTNERS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds MADONNA REHABILITATION HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER AND SAUNDERS COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds CIVIC NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds Project Pinkd Inc ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds KEARNEY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Area Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Duncan Family Trust · Cooper Foundation · Acklie Charitable Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · Abel Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Olsson Family Foundation · Kinder Porter Scott Family Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Lee and Debbie Stuart Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bryan Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.