Skip to content
Brutocao Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Brutocao Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$146kHealth$27kReligion$19kCommunity Improvement$5kRecreation & Sports$500
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$757k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$32,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY$14,000
NOTRE DAME$13,740
IMPACT100 ORANGE COUNTY$5,000
ST ANNE SCHOOL$5,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$3,044
MEMORIAL CARE SADDLEBACK MEDICAL CT$2,000
JSERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO$1,109
OLD MISSION SANTA BARBARA$70
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 7%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $23k → 8%ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 10%BISHOP AMAT: $200 → 14%OLD MISSION SANTA BARBARA: $70 → 14%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $591 → 14%NOTRE DAME: $30k → 13%VIVERE BRUTOCO DAFAEF: $32k → 13%GILMORE ACADEMY: $7k → 17%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $16k → 8%RAD CAMP: $500 → 10%ABC2-ACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE: $900 → 14%PARSEGHIAN MEDICAL RESEARCH FUND: $21k → 13%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $14k → 8%ST ANNE SCHOOL: $5k → 10%NOTRE DAME: $14k → 13%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $13k → 8%ST ANNE SCHOOL: $5k → 10%NOTRE DAME: $10k → 13%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $7k → 8%ST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1k → 10%NOTRE DAME: $5k → 13%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $3k → 8%ST MARY AND ALL ANGELS: $3k → 10%NOTRE DAME: $4k → 13%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $2k → 8%ST MARY AND ALL ANGELS: $310 → 10%PARSEGHIAN MEDICAL RESEARCH FUND: $4k → 13%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%ST MARY AND ALL ANGELS: $189 → 10%NOTRE DAME: $1k → 13%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $2k → 8%NOTRE DAME: $67 → 13%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $4k → 10%SANTA CLARA UNIVERISTY: $992 → 8%JSERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 10%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $180 → 8%MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $1k → 10%MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $600 → 10%MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $500 → 10%MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $301 → 10%MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $150 → 10%MISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $106 → 10%IMPACT 100 OC: $5k → 10%IMPACT100 ORANGE COUNTY: $5k → 10%THE CERNA FOUNDATION: $300 → 10%MEMORIAL CARE SADDLEBACK MEDICAL CT: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 7 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$200k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+31%

Still filing today

43%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureReligionCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +39%
  • BM
    BONDI MINISTRIES
    3× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +14%
  • SA
    St Anne School
    2× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • JS
    JUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • GA
    GILMOUR ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • I
    IMPACT100OCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Stena Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
3
Studenica Foundation
—
4
Stanbridge University Foundation
Education
5
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
6
The Stanford & Joan Alexander Foundation
—
7
St Jude's Catholic School Foundation
—
8
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
9
Curebound

Curebound's mission is to accelerate cancer research and save lives. we raise and invest strategic funding for innovative adult and pediatric cancer research with one vision: cures in our lifetime.

Health
10
Ascena Foundation
—
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junipero Serra Catholic High School; the most unlike its peers is Cerna Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOTRE DAME: $62,890 · OtherNOTRE DAMEIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARSEGHIAN MEDICAL RESEARCH FUND: $25,097 · OtherPARSEGHIAN MEDICAL RESEARCH FUNDSt Anne School: $10,012 · OtherSt Anne SchoolJUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherJUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOLMISSION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO: $6,866 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INC: $6,793 · Other+9 more: $14,835 · Other+9 morePRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $80,965 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CL…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $7,218 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND …BONDI MINISTRIES: $11,000 · ReligionIMPACT100OC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $1,500 · Arts & CultureRAD CAMP INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsCERNA FOUNDATION: $300 · Philanthropy
Other$168,493Education$88,183Religion$11,000Community Improvement$5,000Arts & Culture$1,500Recreation & Sports$500Philanthropy$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $80,965 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBONDI MINISTRIES: $11,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSt Anne School: $10,012 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $7,218 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT100OC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE INC: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAD CAMP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCERNA FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BONDI MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds St Anne School ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT100OC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAD CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds CERNA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brutocao Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brutocao Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brutocao Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Brutocao Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brutocao Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home