Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bruce W Gilpin Memorial Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Bruce W Gilpin Memorial Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Greater Tacoma Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Bruce W Gilpin Memorial Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $91k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
17
9
18
14
19
9
20
14
21
6
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Philanthropy$2.0MHealth$159kFood & Nutrition$117kAnimals$107kHuman Services$69kYouth Development$30k
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k10 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK$20,000
PUGET SOUND PET FOOD BANK$10,000
SOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION$10,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE$10,000
PACIFIC PUG RESCUE$7,500
DANNY & RON'S RESCUE$5,000
KINDRED SOULS FOUNDATION$5,000
NW FURNITURE BANK$5,000
TACOMA BOAT BUILDERS$5,000
LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC$5,000
CHARLIE'S ACRES$2,500
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY$2,500
RAISING GIRLS$2,000
THRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WISHING WELL FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%AMARA: $20k → 9%AMARA: $12k → 9%AMARA: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$424k · 15 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$424k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+75%

Still filing today

87%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DIABETES ASSOC OF PIERCE COUNTY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $87k · revenue +11% · 26% of their budget
  • EF
    EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +34%
  • AMARA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $42k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +49%
  • The Houston Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +107%
  • WW
    WISHING WELL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dog Gone Seattle

Dog Gone Seattle is a Washington-based nonprofit organization dedicated to saving homeless dogs in high-kill shelters in Washington and beyond through rescue, foster, and adoption. We are a foster-based organization, and our rescue is 100%…

Animals
2
Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

3
Northwest Wag Rescue

NorthWest Wag Rescue is dedicated to representing the rights of animals everywhere. We work tirelessly to get animals out of shelters and dangerous situations and find them loving forever homes in the Pacific NorthWest.

Animals
4
People for Animal Care and Kindness

Provide food, supplies, veterinary services & toys to Pierce & King counties food banks, shelters & to low income and homeless individuals.

Animals
5
Washington Basset Rescue

Dog rescue

Animals
6
Sos Lost Pet Rescue Nw Inc

Decrease over population of feral cats by trapping and doing spay or neuter. Provide veterinarian care to kittens. Take owner relinquishments of pets they can no longer care for. Taking in abandoned animals and providing veterinary care.…

Animals
7
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
8
Pacific Pups Rescue

Pacific Pups Rescue saves Dogs & Puppies & puts them with a Foster Parent so they can be adopted by a loving Family

Health
9
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
10
Feisty Felines

Trap Neuter Return of cats in Thurston County, WA.

Animals
11
Purrfect Pals

Through placement and prevention programs, partnering with other shelters and rescue groups, purrfect pals works to end cat homelessness in the puget sound region with a focus on special needs cats. resources are provided for low income…

12
Wag Again Rescue

We opened up our clinic and through the low-cost wellness we provided, we kept approximately 14,600 dogs in their homes which means they werent in shelters, the streets, or being rehomed in 2024 and provided access to low-cost care to…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Unlimited Network and the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,986,877 · PhilanthropyGREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more — $18,000 · PhilanthropyDIABETES ASSOC OF PIERCE COUNTY — $87,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $20,000 · HealthSOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $9,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $7,500 · HealthEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $70,000 · Food & NutritionPUGET SOUND PET FOOD BANK — $40,000 · Food & NutritionPACIFIC PUG RESCUE INC — $30,000 · AnimalsKindred Souls Foundation — $25,000 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS RESCUE — $15,000 · Animals+3 more — $6,000 · AnimalsAMARA — $42,000 · Human ServicesNW FURNITURE BANK — $20,000 · Human ServicesWISHING WELL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human Services+2 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesLINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,500 · OtherTACOMA YOUTH MARINE CENTER — $9,000 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF TACOMA — $5,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON — $3,000 · International
Philanthropy$2,004,877Health$133,500Food & Nutrition$110,000Animals$76,000Human Services$71,000Other$69,500International$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,986,877 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetDIABETES ASSOC OF PIERCE COUNTY — $87,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMARA — $42,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPUGET SOUND PET FOOD BANK — $40,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetPACIFIC PUG RESCUE INC — $30,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetKindred Souls Foundation — $25,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNW FURNITURE BANK — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTACOMA COMMUNITY BOAT BUILDERS INC — $18,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISHING WELL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharlies Acres — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAISING GIRLS — $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILIES UNLIMITED NETWORK — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Tacoma Community FoundationWA30.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Korum for Kids Foundation · The Bamford Foundation · Names Family Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · The Norcliffe Foundation · The Dimmer Family Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · Heidner Marco J Char Trust · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Multicare Health System

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bruce W Gilpin Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph