Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bruce N Griffing Trust U W Por 3

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$147kHuman Services$40kReligion$16kArts & Culture$13kHealth$3k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$575k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIRL SCOUTS OF CONNECTICUT INC$8,000
HOUSATONIC COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERIC$7,500
ADAM WYSOTA FOUNDATION INC$5,500
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER NAUGATUCK V$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER FAIRFIELD$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YMCA INC: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 7 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +94% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$176k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+94%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADAM WYSOTA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +143%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 69 HOUSATONIC COUNCIL
    3× · 2018–2020 · $21k · revenue +23%
  • AF
    ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT
    2× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • CC
    CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +94%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Yankee Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

Please refer to page 1, part 1, question 1 and schedule o for the organizations mission.

—
2
Boys and Girls Club of Greater Waterbury

To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
3
Boys & Girls Club of Northern Westchester

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
4
Gan Yeladim of Stamford Inc

A safe, loving, and inclusive learning community where children, families, and staff feel welcome, accepted, and supported and where individuals are empowered to contribute their unique experiences and interests.

Education
5
Boys & Girls Club the Northern Neck

To inspire and to enable all young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens

Youth Development
6
Girl Scouts of Southeastern New England

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place. the girl scout leadership experience provides girls in kindergarten through twelfth grade with a variety of skill-building and leadership…

—
7
Meeting Waters Ymca

The organization's mission is "building strong communities by inspiring all to develop healthy spirit, mind and body." we envision communities where people of all ages: embody the values of caring, honesty, reepect and responsibility;…

Human Services
8
Young Mens Christian Assoc of Greenwich Inc

The ymca of greenwich's mission is: to bring together and strengthen the community through programs and services that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all men, women and children.

Human Services
9
Youth Soccer Association of New Haven Inc

Develop local youth in soccer skills and team play

—
10
Children's Museum of Southeastern Connecticut Inc

The mission of the Childrens Museum is to encourage learning and spark imagination by engaging childen and all families through creative and hands-on play in a safe and accessible

Arts & Culture
11
Boys & Girls Club of Greater New Bedford Inc

The boys & girls club of greater new bedford, inc. is dedicated to providing a stimulating and wholesome environment which promotes social, educational, character and physical development for children and young adults ages 7 - 18 years.…

Youth Development
12
Jewish Community Center of Schenectady Inc

Our mission is to build a vibrant, welcoming, and inclusive community that embraces our jewish values, culture, identity and connections to israel, engages the local community, and enhances the body, mind and spirit of our members.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tommy Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: $56,000 · OtherGirl Scouts of Connecticut IncBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER: $29,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWERBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 69 HOUSATONIC COUNCIL: $20,750 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 69 HOUSATONIC COUNCILMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 · OtherMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INCBOOKS 4 KIDS PROGRAM: $15,150 · OtherBOOKS 4 KIDS PROGRAMHOUSATONIC COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERIC: $7,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,000 · Other+3 more: $9,000 · Other+3 moreTHE ADAM WYSOTA FOUNDATION INC: $32,750 · PhilanthropyTHE ADAM WYSOTA …ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT: $5,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE TOMMY FUND INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$160,900Philanthropy$32,750Arts & Culture$10,500Human Services$7,500Youth Development$5,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGirl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: $56,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADAM WYSOTA FOUNDATION INC: $32,750 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 69 HOUSATONIC COUNCIL: $20,750 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TOMMY FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ADAM WYSOTA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 69 HOUSATONIC COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CONNECTICUT COAST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE TOMMY FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ion Bank Foundation IncCT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ion Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Valley Community Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bruce N Griffing Trust U W Por 3 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bruce N Griffing Trust U W Por 3. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Boys & Girls Club of the Lower Naugatuck Valley: 19% of income from government
  • Central Connecticut Coast Young Men's Christian Association Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Connecticut: 14% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bruce N Griffing Trust U W Por 3’s filings →

More from the funding graph