· Private foundation
Bruce and Kylene Allbright Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST MARY'S FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| PRESCOTT AREA SHELTER SERVICES | $15,000 |
| THE FOSTER ALLIANCE FORMALLY ARIZONA HELPING HANDS | $15,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SMST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +31%
- TFTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE8× · 2018–2025 · $132k · revenue +9%
- HNHUSHABYE NURSERY2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +278%
Funded once
- SCSOJOURNER CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +50%
- CCCHILD CRISIS ARIZONAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +151%
- AHARIZONA HELPING HANDSINCone grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.
The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.
To provide needed services for abused, neglected, and vulnerable children and their families.
To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.
Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.
Promotes Safe Haven education and awareness on the existing Safe Haven Law in Arizona to prevent the illegal abandonment of infants across the state.
To provide resources to children in AZ DCS Custody
Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.
Provide support services and counseling for expectant mothers and those hoping to adopt from arizona.
Free arts for abused children of arizona (free arts) is a nonprofit organization that transforms children's trauma to resilience through the arts. since 1993, free arts has served more than 155,400 children in maricopa county in arizona.…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Bruce and Kylene Allbright Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bruce and Kylene Allbright Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Bruce and Kylene Allbright Family’s filings →