Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Browning Ida W Tr U W

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$68kReligion$67kEducation$49kYouth Development$29kHuman Services$28kHealth$8kCrime & Legal$8kPublic Benefit$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$711k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENNON ORGANIZATION$11,000
NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG$9,000
BRETHREN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$7,000
ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$4,000
UNITED FRONT ORGANIZATION INC$3,000
SECOND CITY CHURCH$2,000
THE JOSHUA GROUP$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $2k → 11%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $3k → 8%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $1k → 8%JUSTICE HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $5k → 8%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $2k → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $2k → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $2k → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $2k → 12%THE ARC OF DAUPHIN COUNTY: $4k → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $2k → 12%SOMEONE TO TELL IT TO INC: $5k → 12%TLC WORKBASED TRAINING PROGRAMS INC: $3k → 12%BRO2GO INC: $3k → 12%BRETHREN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $7k → 12%PAXTON MINISTRIES: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$158k · 9 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
31

Total granted

$158k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+19%

Still filing today

78%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PENNON ORGANIZATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $61k · revenue +89%
  • TN
    THE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG
    4× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +32%
  • SS
    ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • HF
    HARRISBURG FIRST CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • LW
    LIVING WATER COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Peniel Drug & Alcohol Residential Treatment Facility

Peniel drug and alcohol residential treatment facility's primary purpose is to provide a christian drug and alcohol rehabilitation program with facilities in johnstown, pennsylvania.

Religion
2
Pa Treatment & Healing

The mission of pa treatment & healing is to guide people on a path to change through quality counseling, treatment and education. this is accomplished by providing a comprehensive individual and family centered, values oriented treatment…

Community Improvement
3
Maranatha Ministry Inc

To provide food and transitional housing to low income/homeless families and individuals in franklin and surrounding counties in pa

Human Services
4
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
5
Hope Rescue Mission of the City of Reading

The organization offers food, clothing and shelter to the unhomed of berks county. services offered include education and work development, providing spiritual transformation through discipleship, church attendence, bibel study and prayer…

6
Pennsylvania Prison Society

The mission of the pennsylvania prison society is to protect the health, safety, and dignity of incarcerated people in pennsylvania.

Crime & Legal
7
New Hope Philly Inc

Our mission is to provide a support system for men seeking to be free from addiction that fosters long-term success and well being. To this end, we provide housing for men that have come out of addiction. We provide life skills workshops,…

Health
8
Connections Work

Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.

9
Bridge of Hope Harrisburg Area

To end and prevent homelessness for single mothers and their children in cumberland, dauphin and york counties of pennsylvania, with professional case-management support, and the assistance of trained mentoring volunteer groups from local…

Human Services
10
Step By Step Inc

The provision of housing, rehabilitation, and support services to individuals with emotional and developmental disabilities along with support and treatment services for individuals with drug and alcohol addictions.

Human Services
11
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
12
New Visions of South Central Pa Inc

Mental health therapy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethesda Mission of Harrisburg Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gather the Spirit for Justice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen's Residential Recover…Early Learning and Youth De…Emergency Assistance & Basi…Local History & Member ClubsRegional Arts & Culture Org…Faith-Based Senior CareBehavioral Health & Rehabil…Pennsylvania Child & Family…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%11%<5yr13%11%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr17%22%35–55yr17%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%5%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr17%10%35–55yr17%34%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
8%
297/3,950

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE JOSHUA GROUP — $9,114 · OtherTHE JOSHUA GROUPST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $7,765 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHHARRISBURG FIRST CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN — $7,500 · OtherHARRISBURG FIRST CHURCH OF THE BRETH…LIVING WATER COMMUNITY CHURCH — $6,128 · OtherLIVING WATER COMMUNITY CHURCHENOLA MOUNT ZION UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherENOLA MOUNT ZION UNITED METHODIST CH…CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER UNITED CHURCH OF — $5,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE REDEEMER UNITED CHURCH…ST PAULS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN — $5,000 · OtherST PAULS EVANGELICAL LUTHERANHARRISBURG BIC CHURCH — $4,670 · OtherBEAUTIFUL YOU ENTERPRISE — $4,645 · OtherPENBROOK CHURCH OF GOD — $4,000 · OtherEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT OF — $3,401 · OtherUNITED FRONT ORGANIZATION INC — $3,000 · OtherPAXTON CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN — $3,000 · OtherCOLONIAL PARK UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST — $3,000 · Other+9 more — $17,359 · Other+9 morePENNON ORGANIZATION — $60,959 · Arts & CulturePENNON ORGANIZATIONSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM — $7,000 · Arts & CultureSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUMTHE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG — $28,765 · EducationTHE NATIVITY SCHOOL …ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $19,145 · EducationST STEPHEN'S EPISCOP…+1 more — $1,500 · EducationCENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC — $10,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHAMPIO…BRETHREN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES — $7,000 · Human ServicesBRETHREN COMMUNITY…JUSTICE HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesJUSTICE HOUSE OF H…SOMEONE TO TELL IT TO INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesSOMEONE TO TELL IT…THE ARC OF DAUPHIN COUNTY INC — $3,964 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF DAUPHIN…NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $3,750 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINISTRIE…BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA MISSION O…BRO2GO LLC — $2,500 · Human ServicesBRO2GO LLCTLC Work Based Training Program Inc — $2,500 · Human ServicesTLC Work Based Tra…PAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY — $1,637 · Human ServicesMEDARDS HOUSE — $13,945 · Youth DevelopmentGAUDENZIA INC — $3,000 · HealthCONTACT HELPLINE — $1,310 · HealthPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY SUPPORT ALLIANCE — $2,200 · Crime & LegalGather the Spirit for Justice — $763 · Food & Nutrition
Other$88,582Arts & Culture$67,959Education$49,410Human Services$44,851Youth Development$13,945Health$4,310Crime & Legal$2,200Food & Nutrition$763

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION — $60,959 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG — $28,765 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $19,145 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMEDARDS HOUSE — $13,945 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC — $10,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM — $7,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJUSTICE HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSOMEONE TO TELL IT TO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGAUDENZIA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRO2GO LLC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTLC Work Based Training Program Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY SUPPORT ALLIANCE — $2,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY — $1,637 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAUPHIN COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONTACT HELPLINE — $1,310 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENNON ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds THE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG
  • Who funds ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds MEDARDS HOUSE
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds BRETHREN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
  • Who funds JUSTICE HOUSE OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds SOMEONE TO TELL IT TO INC
  • Who funds THE ARC OF DAUPHIN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds GAUDENZIA INC
  • Who funds BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC
  • Who funds BRO2GO LLC
  • Who funds TLC Work Based Training Program Inc
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY SUPPORT ALLIANCE
  • Who funds PAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY
  • Who funds DAUPHIN COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM
  • Who funds CONTACT HELPLINE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA33.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · United Way of the Capital Region · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Hall Foundation · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Community Aid Inc · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · Alexander and Jane Boyd Ta Foundation · Kenneth Bankert Foundation Inc · Anne & Philip Glatfelter III Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Browning Ida W Tr U W funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph