Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brown Tassell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$992kHuman Services$187kHousing & Shelter$122kEducation$95kRecreation & Sports$77kFood & Nutrition$58kAnimals$51kCommunity Improvement$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
SAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION$20,000
HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
TUNNEL TO TOWER FOUNDATION$10,000
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES$10,000
MICHIGAN VETERANS HOME$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$10,000
WORLD MISSION$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF WEST MI$8,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY$5,000
IRONMAN FOUNDATION$5,000
HUMANE SOCEITY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $5k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $2k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $5k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $2k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $4k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $4k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $4k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 11%PARKINSON'S ASSOCIATION OF WEST MIC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 34 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
9

Total granted

$1.6M
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+76%

Still filing today

71%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +126%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +50%
  • MT
    MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • FO
    FANS OF VALLEY FIELDgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +76%
  • FL
    FRED & LENA MEIJER HEART CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • WM
    WEST MICHIGAN HISPANIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Movement West Michigan

Uniting christian faith leaders to serve with humility and love for the flourishing of all in our community.

Religion
2
West Michigan Christian Foundation

None

Religion
3
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
4
Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan

Centrica meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
5
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
6
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
8
Wings of Hope Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

Hospice care - wings of hope hospice and palliative care, inc. provides compassionate care in the later stages of life and support through the grief experience for individuals and families.

Human Services
9
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
10
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
11
Hospice of Holland Inc

The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.

Human Services
12
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vickys Pet Connection. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $205,000 · OtherHELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITALCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $61,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESFANS OF VALLEY FIELD: $50,000 · OtherFRED & LENA MEIJER HEART CENTER: $50,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY INC: $45,000 · OtherSOUTH END COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $44,000 · OtherMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $44,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES WESTERN MICHIGAN: $42,000 · Other+28 more: $301,250 · Other+28 moreSAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION: $295,000 · HealthSAINT MARY'S FOUNDATIONCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $225,000 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MI…+2 more: $15,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EducationLiteracy Center of West Michigan: $17,000 · EducationPaws With A Cause: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $22,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Michigan Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesPARKINSON'S ASSOCIATION OF WEST MICHIGAN: $2,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN: $30,000 · AnimalsHARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,000 · AnimalsKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $6,000 · Food & NutritionUNKNOWN NATIONS: $33,000 · International
Other$992,250Health$535,000Education$62,000Human Services$59,000Animals$39,000Food & Nutrition$36,000International$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION: $295,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetFANS OF VALLEY FIELD: $50,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $44,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES WESTERN MICHIGAN: $42,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNKNOWN NATIONS: $33,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN: $30,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $30,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $25,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $17,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLiteracy Center of West Michigan: $17,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFaith Hospice: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEXODUS PLACE: $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE REHAB CENTER LTD: $8,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND 26 INC: $5,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetPARKINSON'S ASSOCIATION OF WEST MICHIGAN: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FANS OF VALLEY FIELD ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES WESTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds UNKNOWN NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds GRAND VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Center of West Michigan ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Faith Hospice ↗
  • Who funds EXODUS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER LTD ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI31.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Weller Family Foundation · The Korff Foundation · Ufp Industries Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · The Wege Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · The Mercantile Bank Foundation · Edp Foundation · The David and Carol Van Andel Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brown Tassell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brown Tassell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brown Tassell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Brown Tassell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brown Tassell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph