Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brooks Charles for Charities

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$550k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$98k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$1.0MHuman Services$1.0MHealth$1.0MYouth Development$510kEducation$399kPhilanthropy$82kEmployment$80kRecreation & Sports$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $254k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $222k
$24,707
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POWER$98,444
THE SALVATION ARMY$65,702
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$57,503
Individual grant recipient$41,105
PITTSBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$40,995
YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$40,995
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$40,610
PASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$24,707
UPMC MERCY$24,707
MAGEE-WOMENS HOSPITAL$24,707
WESTERN PA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF$16,453
LAGHEY CHURCH$8,309
FAMILY RESOURCES$8,254
ST BARNABAS CHARITABLE FDN$8,254
THE CHILDRENS INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH$8,254
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $364k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY RESOURCES: $16k → 9%FAMILY RESOURCES: $15k → 9%FAMILY RESOURCES: $15k → 9%FAMILY RESOURCES: $9k → 9%FAMILY RESOURCES: $9k → 9%FAMILY RESOURCES: $8k → 9%FAMILY RESOURCES: $8k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $80k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $45k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $43k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $41k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 23 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
0

Total granted

$5.4M
$0

Still filing today

39%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $284k · revenue +53%
  • PH
    PASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $240k · revenue +497%
  • WP
    WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
    7× · 2019–2025 · $160k · revenue +31%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

    Health
    2
    Chambersburg Hospital

    The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

    Health
    3
    The Children's Institute Parent Company

    To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

    Education
    4
    Philhaven

    Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

    Health
    5
    Point Park University

    Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

    —
    6
    Waynesboro Hospital

    Waynesboro hospital is a regional nonprofit healthcare organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

    Health
    7
    Albright College

    As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

    Education
    8
    University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    Health
    9
    Wesley Family Services

    To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care.

    Human Services
    10
    Gettysburg Hospital

    Gettysburg hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high quality health care services for the people who live, work, travel through, and vacation in adams county, pennsylvania and northern maryland.

    Health
    11
    Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

    The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

    Education
    12
    Highlands Hospital

    Highlands hospital is committed to providing health care to the community in a competent, nurturing and healing environment. our staff will provide support in times of crisis and furnish the resources necessary to promote a healthy…

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Resources; the most unlike its peers is Chatham University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    5/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    POWER: $957,554 · OtherPOWERTHE SALVATION ARMY: $639,084 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $559,332 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPITTSBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE UTD PREBY CHRC UTD STS AMER: $398,756 · OtherPITTSBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE UTD PREBY CHRC UTD STS AMERUPMC: $289,120 · OtherUPMCBoy Scouts of America: $281,294 · OtherBoy Scouts of AmericaMAGEE-WOMENS HOSPITAL: $240,326 · OtherMAGEE-WOMENS HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $204,675 · OtherUPMC HEALTH SYSTEM - UPMC SOUTH SIDE: $152,729 · Other+6 more: $554,345 · Other+6 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $283,961 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCES: $80,287 · Human ServicesWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $160,039 · EducationCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $82,302 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $75,931 · EducationPASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $240,326 · PhilanthropySTBARNABAS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $82,302 · HealthLIGONIER CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $80,287 · Recreation & Sports
    Other$4,277,215Human Services$364,248Education$318,272Philanthropy$240,326Health$82,302Recreation & Sports$80,287

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $283,961 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBoy Scouts of America: $281,294 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetPASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $240,326 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $160,039 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTBARNABAS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $82,302 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $82,302 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIGONIER CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $80,287 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES: $80,287 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $75,931 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
    • Who funds Boy Scouts of America ↗
    • Who funds PASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF ↗
    • Who funds STBARNABAS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds CHATHAM UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds LIGONIER CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES ↗
    • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Pittsburgh FoundationPA19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · M L Mason Mem Fund 12-26-35 · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Mason Martha Lockhart · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Brooks Charles for Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brooks Charles for Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Brooks Charles for Charities’ filings →

      More from the funding graph