Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brookbank Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$315k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.6MArts & Culture$1.2MRecreation & Sports$228kPhilanthropy$55kReligion$37kHealth$27kEnvironment$24kSocial Science$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Historic Haymarket Milwaukee$100,000
Florentine Opera Company$34,500
Palm Springs International Film Society$30,000
North Shore Library$25,000
North Shore Library$25,000
Wisconsin Aquatics Association Inc$12,000
Walter Schroeder Aquatic Center$10,000
United Way of Greater Milwaukee$10,000
Milwaukee Art Museum$10,000
United Performing Arts Fund$10,000
Friend of Boerner Botanical Gardens Inc$6,000
Milwaukee Public Museum Inc$5,000
Childrens Hospital Foundation$5,000
Milwaukee Ballet$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,068
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Harvard Business School: $5k → 16%Milwaukee Film: $5k → 17%Milwaukee Film: $5k → 17%Latin School of Chicago: $5k → 14%Palm Springs International Film Society: $30k → 11%Palm Springs International Film Society: $21k → 11%University of Wisconsin Foundation: $100k → 10%Walter Schroeder Aquatic Center: $75k → 17%Palm Springs Intl Film Society: $21k → 11%Wisconsin Aquatics Association Inc: $23k → 10%Walter Schroeder Aquatic Center: $75k → 17%Palm Springs International Film Society: $10k → 11%Wisconsin Aquatics Association Inc: $18k → 10%Walter Schroeder Aquatic Center: $10k → 17%Wisconsin Aquatics Association Inc: $12k → 10%Friend of Boerner Botanical Gardens Inc: $6k → 17%Wisconsin Aquatics Association Inc: $9k → 10%Wisconsin Aquatics Association Inc: $6k → 10%Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra: $100k → 17%Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra: $100k → 17%Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra: $100k → 17%Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra: $100k → 17%Milwaukee Art Museum: $48k → 17%Milwaukee Art Museum: $10k → 17%Milwaukee Art Museum: $10k → 17%Milwaukee Art Museum: $10k → 17%Milwaukee Art Museum: $10k → 17%Milwaukee Art Museum: $10k → 17%St Sava Serbian Orthodox Cathedral: $6k → 17%North Shore Library: $25k → 17%North Shore Library: $25k → 17%Historic Haymarket Milwaukee: $100k → 17%Historic Haymarket Milwaukee HHM: $100k → 17%Florentine Opera Company: $35k → 17%Florentine Opera Company: $35k → 17%Medical College of Wisconsin: $600k → 17%Florentine Opera Company: $30k → 17%Medical College of Wisconsin: $600k → 17%United Performing Arts Fund: $10k → 17%Medical College of Wisconsin: $600k → 17%United Performing Arts Fund: $10k → 17%Medical College of Wisconsin: $600k → 17%United Performing Arts Fund: $10k → 17%United Performing Arts Fund: $10k → 17%United Performing Arts Fund: $10k → 17%Florentine Opera Company: $58k → 17%Florentine Opera Company: $35k → 17%Florentine Opera Company: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 39 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
4

Total granted

$4.0M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+24%

Still filing today

69%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +37%
  • FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $242k · revenue +44%
  • HH
    Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +29%
  • TL
    THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +24%
  • HB
    Harvard Business School
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
2
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
3
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
4
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
5
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
6
Milwaukee World Festival Inc

The corporation shall be a civic organization not organized for profit but operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes including in furtherance thereof, the production of an annual festival in the milwaukee metropolitan…

Arts & Culture
7
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters

To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.

Arts & Culture
8
Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra Inc

Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
9
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
10
Wisconsin Municipal Clerks Association Incorporated

Our mission is to be the premier source for the personal empowerment of municipal clerks in wisconsin through education, professional development, and the promotion of excellence.

—
11
Milwaukee Public Museum Endowment Fund

Supporting the charitable, scientific and educational purposes of the milwaukee public museum.

—
12
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Amundsen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $2,401,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Education+3 more: $18,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $400,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA …FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $242,175 · Arts & CultureFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INCHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $200,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee …MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $98,400 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INCUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $106,098 · Arts & Culture+9 moreWALTER SCHROEDER AQUATIC CENTER LTD: $160,000 · Recreation & SportsPALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY: $82,000 · Recreation & SportsWISCONSIN AQUATICS ASSOCIATION INC: $67,705 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsNorth Shore Library: $50,000 · OtherBoerner Botanical Gardens: $16,500 · OtherST SAVA SERBIAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL: $16,000 · OtherEconomics Wisconsin: $11,500 · OtherSt Christophers Episcopal Church: $10,000 · OtherSt Johns Lutheran Church and School: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,136 · OtherOld World Foundation: $5,500 · Other+10 more: $36,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 · HealthTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthVERSITI INC: $5,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center: $2,000 · Health
Education$2,519,000Arts & Culture$1,096,673Recreation & Sports$315,705Other$163,636Philanthropy$60,000Health$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $2,401,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $400,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $242,175 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWALTER SCHROEDER AQUATIC CENTER LTD: $160,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $98,400 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY: $82,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetWISCONSIN AQUATICS ASSOCIATION INC: $67,705 over 5y, 68% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $21,530 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $14,068 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVERSITI INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT ACT THEATRE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Amundsen: $3,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMAN'S CLUB OF WISCONSIN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds WALTER SCHROEDER AQUATIC CENTER LTD ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN AQUATICS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BOERNER BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALVERNO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERSITI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT ACT THEATRE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI29.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Gardner Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · The Ros Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · National Center for Housing Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brookbank Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brookbank Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brookbank Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Brookbank Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brookbank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph