Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brook Trout Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2026.

Membership Benefit$429kHealth$116kPhilanthropy$53kReligion$50kRecreation & Sports$47kInternational$30kCrime & Legal$25kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASONIC VILLAGES GRAND LODGE OF PA$68,250
CHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC$18,000
HARRISBURG AREA FOOD PANTRY$12,625
BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG$5,625
MISS BOBBIS PLACE INC$5,500
THE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING$5,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$5,000
DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$5,000
GOD LUV YA FOUNDATION$5,000
ZION EVAN LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MISS BOBBIS PLACE INC: $6k → 9%THE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES: $3k → 12%THE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES: $3k → 12%DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA: $10k → 12%DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA: $10k → 12%BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG: $6k → 12%BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG: $5k → 12%DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
SD
OH
PA
CT
CA
NE
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$755k · 16 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -57% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$755k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-57%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2021–2026 · $30k · revenue +1%
  • BM
    BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $27k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • HR
    HARRISBURG RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -67%
  • VO
    VETERANS OUTREACH OF PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -57%
  • HA
    HARRISBURG AREA FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
2
Penn State Health

Penn state health's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people of pennsylvania, and beyond. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and equitable care; educates and trains (continued…

Health
3
Stc Healthcare Partners Llc

Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…

Health
4
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
5
Penn State Health Hampden Medical Center

Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…

Health
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Pa

Ronald mcdonald house charities of central pa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
8
Pennsylvania Partnerships for Children

Pennyslvania partnerships for children is a strong, effective, and trusted voice for improving the health, education, and well being of the children and youth in pennsylvania.

Youth Development
9
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
10
The Milton S Hershey Medical Center

Mshmc's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate, culturally responsive and equitable care, educate and trains healthcare…

Health
11
The Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania

To advocate for and provide services to pennsylvania's hospitals and health systems to advance high-quality accessible and financially sustainable health care.

—
12
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethesda Mission of Harrisburg Inc; the most unlike its peers is Miss Bobbis Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASONIC VILLAGES GRAND LODGE OF PA: $420,000 · OtherMASONIC VILLAGES GRAND LODGE OF PACHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $87,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INCSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $27,000 · Other+14 more: $101,125 · Other+14 moreBETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC: $29,625 · Human ServicesDAUPHIN COUNTY CASA: $25,000 · Human ServicesMISS BOBBIS PLACE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyORDER OF DEMOLAY IN PENNSYLVANIA: $5,500 · PhilanthropyGod Luv Ya Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropySave The Children Federation Inc: $30,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,625 · InternationalHARRISBURG RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $19,000 · HealthHARRISBURG AREA FOOD PANTRY: $12,625 · Food & Nutrition
Other$635,625Human Services$65,125Philanthropy$46,500International$43,625Recreation & Sports$20,000Health$19,000Food & Nutrition$12,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $36,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC: $29,625 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAUPHIN COUNTY CASA: $25,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetHARRISBURG RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB INC: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OUTREACH OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetORDER OF DEMOLAY IN PENNSYLVANIA: $5,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENN STATE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA ↗
  • Who funds HARRISBURG RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRISBURG AREA FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OUTREACH OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds MISS BOBBIS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ORDER OF DEMOLAY IN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds God Luv Ya Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds PENN STATE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Pennsylvania Food BankPA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · United Way of the Capital Region · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brook Trout Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brook Trout Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brook Trout’s filings →

More from the funding graph