Skip to content

· Public charity

Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc

Bronxwood Home for the Aged, Inc., a voluntary, not-for-profit facility, is located in Bronx, NY.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$5.4MReligion$2.4MEducation$2.4MFood & Nutrition$1.6MPhilanthropy$93kHealth$75kHousing & Shelter$55k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $718k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cong Ahavas Tzedokah VChesed$500,000
Congregation Machna Shalva$500,000
Together We Are$200,000
Cong Khal Torath Chaim Viznit$168,000
Jerusalem Open House$150,000
Study Center$125,000
Catholic Health Care Foundati$75,000
Congregation Sons of Israel$25,000
Shuvu Return$25,000
Women in Need Inc$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Bronx House: $25k → 28%Batya Girls Inc: $25k → 11%Batya Girls Inc: $25k → 11%Women in Need Inc: $20k → 17%Women in Need Inc: $10k → 17%Together We Are: $200k → 20%Misaskim: $500k → 20%Misaskim: $500k → 20%Together We Are: $100k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 13 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$8.5M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+25%

Still filing today

38%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MISASKIM CORP
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +19%
  • TW
    TOGETHER WE ARE
    2× · 2018–2024 · $300k · revenue +64% · 47% of their budget
  • BG
    BATYA GIRLS INC
    2× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • BR
    BAIS RUCHEL HIGH SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • CY
    CONGREGATION & YESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADAS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tzidkas Binyomin Inc

Tzidkas Binyamin is organized for charitable, religious and educational purposes, to assist Jewish orthodox institutions and needy individuals in need of financial aid.

Philanthropy
2
Noam Shabbos Inc

To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel

Religion
3
Yaazoru Chasdei Binyomin Inc

Provides financial assistance to low income individuals and thier families. Promotes Jewish religous practices and activities through thier various programs in the United States and Israel.

International
4
Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc

To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families.

Philanthropy
5
Taharusam Inc

To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.

Philanthropy
6
Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc

The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.

Human Services
7
Yazoiry

To provide help for jewish people living in israel to become stronger individuals in every aspect of their lives.

Human Services
8
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
9
Bikur Cholim of Staten Island Inc

1. To provide aid in ameliorating the condition of the sick, underprivileged, disadvantaged, and/or economically compromised.2. To supply the needy sick with advice or funds to attain doctors, nurses, ambulances, medicine, and any other…

Human Services
10
Chedvat Neurim Foundation

Education, Housing and Support for Girls in distress ages 14 - 21 years old.

International
11
Zichron Dovid Hakohen Inc

To provide financial assistance, including food and shelter, to needy individuals.

Human Services
12
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Together We Are; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Initiatives Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MESAMCHE LEV-VIYOEL MOISHE INC: $2,050,000 · OtherMESAMCHE LEV-VIYOEL MOISHE INCCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $1,950,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCUNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY TORAH VYIRAH INC: $1,500,000 · OtherUNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY TORAH VYIRAH INCBAIS RUCHEL HIGH SCHOOL INC: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INC: $500,000 · OtherMIFAL EZRA ZICHRON YEHIDE: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION & YESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADAS INC: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION MACHNA SHALVA: $500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEREN SHIVIM: $350,000 · Other+11 more: $1,264,000 · Other+11 moreMISASKIM CORP: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORPTOGETHER WE ARE: $300,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER WE A…BATYA GIRLS INC: $50,000 · Human Services+2 more: $55,000 · Human ServicesTALMUD TORAH CHOCHMAS SHLOMO: $160,000 · ReligionSHUVU RETURN INC: $93,000 · PhilanthropyPaamonim: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK INC: $75,000 · HealthNeighborhood Initiatives Development Corporation: $25,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$10,114,000Human Services$1,405,000Religion$160,000Philanthropy$143,000Health$75,000Housing & Shelter$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,000,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTOGETHER WE ARE: $300,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetTALMUD TORAH CHOCHMAS SHLOMO: $160,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $110,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $93,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK INC: $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPaamonim: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBATYA GIRLS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood Initiatives Development Corporation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBRONX HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE ARE ↗
  • Who funds TALMUD TORAH CHOCHMAS SHLOMO ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SHUVU RETURN INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Paamonim ↗
  • Who funds BATYA GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Initiatives Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BRONX HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY35.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · The Chesed Global Foundation Inc · S O Charitable Trust · The Strasbourg Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Educational Support Foundation Inc · Care Support Foundation Inc · The Jacob Kempler Charitable Foundation Inc · J & R Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bronxwood Home for the Aged’s filings →

    More from the funding graph