· Public charity
Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc
Bronxwood Home for the Aged, Inc., a voluntary, not-for-profit facility, is located in Bronx, NY.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $718k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Congregation Machna Shalva | $500,000 |
| Cong Ahavas Tzedokah VChesed | $500,000 |
| Together We Are | $200,000 |
| Cong Khal Torath Chaim Viznit | $168,000 |
| Jerusalem Open House | $150,000 |
| Study Center | $125,000 |
| Catholic Health Care Foundati | $75,000 |
| Shuvu Return | $25,000 |
| Congregation Sons of Israel | $25,000 |
| Women in Need Inc | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMISASKIM CORP2× · 2018–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +19%
- BGBATYA GIRLS INC2× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue +112%
WOMEN IN NEED INC2× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- CYCONGREGATION & YESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADAS INCone grant, 2017 · $500k
- CTCONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INCone grant, 2017 · $500k
- BRBAIS RUCHEL HIGH SCHOOL INCone grant, 2022 · $500k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Tzidkas Binyamin is organized for charitable, religious and educational purposes, to assist Jewish orthodox institutions and needy individuals in need of financial aid.
To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel
Provides financial assistance to low income individuals and thier families. Promotes Jewish religous practices and activities through thier various programs in the United States and Israel.
To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families.
To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.
The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.
To provide help for jewish people living in israel to become stronger individuals in every aspect of their lives.
Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution
1. To provide aid in ameliorating the condition of the sick, underprivileged, disadvantaged, and/or economically compromised.2. To supply the needy sick with advice or funds to attain doctors, nurses, ambulances, medicine, and any other…
Education, Housing and Support for Girls in distress ages 14 - 21 years old.
To provide financial assistance, including food and shelter, to needy individuals.
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Together We Are and the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Initiatives Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE ARE ↗
- Who funds TALMUD TORAH CHOCHMAS SHLOMO ↗
- Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SHUVU RETURN INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BATYA GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds Paamonim ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Initiatives Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds BRONX HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · The Chesed Global Foundation Inc · S O Charitable Trust · The Strasbourg Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Educational Support Foundation Inc · Care Support Foundation Inc · The Jacob Kempler Charitable Foundation Inc · J & R Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc?
Find your warmest path to Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.