Loading…
· Public charity
Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc
Bronxwood Home for the Aged, Inc., a voluntary, not-for-profit facility, is located in Bronx, NY.
$1.8M
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
1
Communities
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
bereavedmeal kitchenfinancialpoor
2020
—
2021
education
2022
zionbuildingfinancial
2023
girlsjewishbuildingelderly
2024
educational foodkitchenelderly
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $718k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Congregation Machna Shalva$500,000
- Cong Ahavas Tzedokah VChesed$500,000
- Together We Are$200,000
- Cong Khal Torath Chaim Viznit$168,000
- Jerusalem Open House$150,000
- Study Center$125,000
- Catholic Health Care Foundati$75,000
- Shuvu Return$25,000
- Congregation Sons of Israel$25,000
- Women in Need Inc$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 15%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.7M · 13 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
13
9
Total granted
$7.7M
$1.5M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+34%
+63%
Still filing today
38%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesPhilanthropyReligionHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMisaskim2× · 2018–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +34%
- SRShuvu Return Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $93k · revenue +13%
- BGBatya Girls Inc2× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue +112%
Funded once
- BRBais Ruchel High School Incone grant, 2022 · $500k
- CKCongregation Keren Shivimone grant, 2023 · $350k
- TTTalmud Torah Chochmas Shlomoone grant, 2022 · $160k · revenue -18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Taharusam Inc
To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.
Philanthropy
2
Tzidkus Avrohom Beinish Inc
To promote charitable, religious and social development goals by providing grants to promote jewish studies and to provide scholarships and grants to needy families to enable them to achieve educational goals and to meet their basic needs.
Philanthropy
3
Reb Shimon Lakol Inc
To promote religious observance and study in accordance with the jewish faith, to organize study groups in the teaching of jewish law, talmud and kaballah, as well as to provide meals and nourishment to the underprivileged and people…
International
4
Tiferet Rabbi Akiva
Provide financial assistance in order to enrich the lives of individuals with education, spirituality and socieconomically through diversified educational institutions
Philanthropy
5
Tzidkas Binyomin Inc
Tzidkas Binyamin is organized for charitable, religious and educational purposes, to assist Jewish orthodox institutions and needy individuals in need of financial aid.
Philanthropy
6
Torat Shraga Inc
To promote religious instruction in the State of Israel and worldwide. To provide financial assistance to the needy
International
7
Yaazoru Chasdei Binyomin Inc
Provides financial assistance to low income individuals and thier families. Promotes Jewish religous practices and activities through thier various programs in the United States and Israel.
International
8
Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc
The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.
Human Services
9
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
Education
10
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
—
11
Chasdei Yisroel Inc
To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families and to encourage and foster jewish religious activities and observance.
Philanthropy
12
Agudath Israel of America Foundation
To support tax exempt charities in carrying out religious activities
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agudath Israel of America and the most unlike its peers is Batya Girls Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
9%
3,372/36,052
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$8,214,000Human Services$1,380,000Religion$160,000Philanthropy$143,000Health$75,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Ojc FundNY31.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Chayim V Chesed · S O Charitable Trust · Zecher Avrohom Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Fjc · Jewish Communal Fund · Educational Support Foundation Inc · The Strasbourg Foundation · The Chesed Global Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Together We Are.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 270213447 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Together We Are, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 47% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc?
Find your warmest path to Bronxwood Home for the Aged Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines