Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bristol Bay Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$988k
Granted FY2024still arriving
290
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.4MReligion$1.7MArts & Culture$353kEnvironment$23kCommunity Improvement$20kScience & Tech$15kPhilanthropy$10kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 290 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k279 grants · $840k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $147k
$2,500
Median grant
22
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE AND PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT$16,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$14,766
Individual grant recipient$14,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,700
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BRISTOL BAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$8,500
Individual grant recipient$8,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHCENTRAL ALASKA$8,000
THE EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Little Angels Childcare: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 381 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

381 repeat relationships: 170 still active in FY2024, 211 since wound down; 91 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

381
576

Total granted

$4.9M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+20%

Still filing today

1%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $293k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2023 · $34k · revenue +71%
  • BB
    Bristol Bay Historical Society Inc
    3× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +119%
  • SA
    SAFE AND FEAR-FREE ENVIRONMENT INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • SR
    SOUTHWEST REGION SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bristol Bay Native Association Inc

The Mission of BBNA is to maintain and promote a strong regional organization supported by the Tribes of Bristol Bay to serve as a unified voice to provide social, economic, cultural, educational opportunities and initiatives to benefit…

Human Services
2
Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation

To provide health care with competence and sensitivity.

Health
3
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
4
The Aleut Foundation
Education
5
Kodiak Scholarship Foundation

Organize and assist kodiak island borough students to pursue post-secondary education in their chosen field of study, and to assist institutions of post-secondary education or training located within the kodiak island borough

Education
6
Alaska Pacific University

Apu provides a world-class, hands-on, culturally-responsive educational experience in collaboration with our students, communities, and tribal partners.

Education
7
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
8
Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission

The Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (Commission), based in Utqiagvik, Alaska, is a nonprofit corporation organized for the purpose of preserving and enhancing the marine resources of Bowhead whales including protection of habitat, Eskimo…

—
9
Northern Alaska Environmental Center

Since 1971, the northern alaska environmental center has promoted environmental conservation and sustainable resource stewardship in interior and arctic alaska through education and advocacy.

Environment
10
Food Bank of Alaska

FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry. We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska by obtaining and providing food to partner agencies and through anti-hunger leadership.

Food & Nutrition
11
Pacific Northern Academy

To educate students to be exceptional learners and independent thinkers of vision, courage, and integrity.

—
12
Alaska Public Interest Research Group

Consumer Advocacy

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Choggiung Educational Endowment Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 1,049 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

See: $1,690,940 · OtherSee+194 more: $2,360,885 · Other+194 moreUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $34,000 · EducationBristol Bay Historical Society Inc: $21,350 · Arts & CultureBRISTOL BAY HERITAGE LAND TRUST: $17,810 · EnvironmentPEDRO BAY BENEFITS CORPORATION INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $8,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,051,825Education$34,000Arts & Culture$21,350Environment$17,810Community Improvement$10,000Youth Development$8,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $34,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBristol Bay Historical Society Inc: $21,350 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetBRISTOL BAY HERITAGE LAND TRUST: $17,810 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bristol Bay Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRISTOL BAY HERITAGE LAND TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationAK25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp · The Alaska Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bristol Bay Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bristol Bay Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bristol Bay Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bristol Bay Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1049 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bristol Bay’s filings →

    More from the funding graph