· Private foundation
Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Congregation Ramat Daled | $36,000 |
| GLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER | $18,000 |
| CONGREGATION NESIVOS | $12,360 |
| MATBIA CHARITIES | $10,465 |
| Sheiris l'pinchos haolami | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION YESHIVA AVIR YAKOV | $7,200 |
| Orchos Chaim | $5,000 |
| KAHAL BARDITCHEV | $4,000 |
| M&S Kollel Grocery Inc | $2,750 |
| MERKAZ HAKOLILIM SHIKUN SQUARE | $2,600 |
| CHELKAINY IMUHEM INC | $2,400 |
| Dina Morechin Jacobs Gemilas Chesed Fund | $2,050 |
| Congregation Yisroel Kedoshim | $1,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| MOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF WILLIAMSBURG | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
29 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- GCGLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER6× · 2020–2025 · $116k
- CYCONGREGATION YESHIVA AVIR YAKOV5× · 2021–2025 · $67k
- SHSHEKEL HAKODESH5× · 2017–2024 · $65k
Funded once
- CZCONGREAGATION ZEMACH DAVID OF WILLIAMSBURG INCone grant, 2024 · $55k
- MJMERKAZ JERUSALEMone grant, 2021 · $36k
- VHVAAD HARABONIMone grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We promote and spread the religious teachings and philosophies of the holy Baal Shem Tov from Poland, who is regarded as the founder of Hasidic Judaism We provide financial assistance to Bais Vaad Lechachomim, a not for profit organization…
Promulgation and dissemination of Jewish customs, values and ideals to enhance the observance and traditions of Jewish orthodoxy.
To spread the philosophies of the holy Rabbi Jacob Joseph Twersky from Square Ukraine by printing his philosophies and lectures for the public. The organization also provides assistance to religious schools and religious non-profit…
To aid the poor and beedy with food, clothing abd spiritual gudiance
Religious Teaching
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Assistance to the indigent
To promote religious study worldwide; to provide financial assistance to other religious, educational, and charitable organizations as well as to needy individuals.
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Lodz Charitable Trust · The Gds Foundation · Ani Mamin Foundation · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Mezritch Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Cco Services · Masmudei Talent Group Inc · Vyazreim Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Breuer’s filings →