Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brendsel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$309k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$1.4MArts & Culture$321kReligion$195kInternational$77kHealth$50kEducation$25kHousing & Shelter$5kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC$110,000
BAY JOURNAL MEDIA$100,000
GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING SYMPHONY$25,000
HIAS INC$20,000
WETA$2,000
WYOMING PUBLIC MEDIA$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 33% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLE: $25k → 7%BAY JOURNAL MEDIA: $100k → 9%TREE OF LIFE CONGREGATION: $5k → 11%CHABAD OF POWAY: $5k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 6%WETA: $2k → 7%WEST NIDAROS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 9%HAMMOND HARWOOD HOUSE: $5k → 6%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $200k → 7%HIAS INC: $20k → 8%SHORERIVERS INC: $25k → 10%BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25k → 19%MENTAL HEALTH COALITION OF TETON: $25k → 7%BAY JOURNAL MEDIA: $50k → 9%GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 6%WETA: $2k → 7%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $110k → 7%HIAS INC: $15k → 8%CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE: $25k → 10%BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25k → 19%MENTAL HEALTH COALITION OF TETON: $25k → 7%BAY JOURNAL MEDIA: $50k → 9%GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $50k → 6%WETA: $2k → 7%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $108k → 7%HIAS INC: $15k → 8%MIDSHORE RIVERKEEPER CONSERVANCY: $25k → 10%BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25k → 19%BAY JOURNAL MEDIA: $50k → 9%GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25k → 6%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $100k → 7%HIAS INC: $15k → 8%CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE: $25k → 10%BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10k → 19%BAY JOURNAL MEDIA: $50k → 9%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $100k → 7%HIAS INC: $5k → 8%BAY JOURNAL MEDIA: $50k → 9%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $100k → 7%HIAS INC: $5k → 8%CHESAPEAKE MEDIA SERVICE: $50k → 9%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $100k → 7%HIAS INC: $2k → 8%CHESAPEAKE MEDIA SERVICE: $50k → 9%QUEEN ANNE'S CONSERVATION ASSOC: $100k → 7%CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE: $25k → 7%CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
WY
SD
PA
CA
VA
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 12 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$2.0M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+42%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QA
    QUEEN ANNES CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION IN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $918k · revenue +22% · 52% of their budget
  • BJ
    BAY JOURNAL MEDIA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $350k · revenue +15%
  • CW
    CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • MR
    MIDSHORE RIVERKEEPER CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • SI
    SHORERIVERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +42%
  • EF
    EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
5
Delaware Nature Society Inc

Delaware nature society connects people with the natural world to improve our environment through education, advocacy, and conservation.

Environment
6
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

8
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

10
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
11
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
12
Health and Environmental Sciences Institute

The health and environmental sciences institute (hesi) is a nonprofit institution whose mission is to engage scientists from academia, government, industry, nonprofit, and other research institutions to identify and resolve global health…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Educational Telecommunications Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Education Foundation of Teton Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

QUEEN ANNES CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION IN — $918,000 · OtherQUEEN ANNES CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INGOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH — $175,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCHCHESAPEAKE MEDIA SERVICE — $100,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE MEDIA SERVICEUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING SYMPHONY — $75,000 · OtherSYMPHONY ASSOCIATION UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH COALITION OF TETON — $50,000 · Other+6 more — $55,000 · OtherBAY JOURNAL MEDIA INC — $350,000 · EnvironmentBAY JOURNAL MEDIA INCCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERIT…SHORERIVERS INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $85,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 · Arts & CultureHIAS INC — $77,000 · InternationalEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC — $25,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,423,000Environment$475,000Arts & Culture$90,500International$77,000Education$25,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetQUEEN ANNES CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION IN — $918,000 over 8y, 52% of budgetBAY JOURNAL MEDIA INC — $350,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC — $100,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC — $77,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHORERIVERS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUEEN ANNES CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION IN
  • Who funds BAY JOURNAL MEDIA INC
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds HIAS INC
  • Who funds SHORERIVERS INC
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brendsel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • Shorerivers Inc13% of income from government
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph