Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brayton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$25kReligion$10kHealth$1kArts & Culture$1kAnimals$750Housing & Shelter$750Youth Development$700Philanthropy$650Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
2
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of TN Martin$2,000
DSCC ANNUAL FUND$1,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$900
Goodfellows$100
New Life Union Mission$100
RHODES COLLEGE$100
Community Cancer Fund$100
Dyersburg-Dyer Co Humane Society$100
Habitat for Humanity$100
McIvers Grant Public Library$100
LODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $350) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%PILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $100 → 24%PILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $100 → 24%PILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $100 → 24%PILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $50 → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 28 repeat orgs$250 to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$53k
$150

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Rhodes College
    9× · 2017–2025 · $800 · revenue +13%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity
    8× · 2017–2025 · $750 · revenue +158%
  • MP
    MID-SOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $700 · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • DC
    DYERSBURG CITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $50
  • DC
    DYER CO ASSOC OF RETARDED
    one grant, 2017 · $50
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $50
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TN MARTIN: $18,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TN MARTINDSCC ANNUAL FUND: $11,500 · OtherDSCC ANNUAL FUNDFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $8,600 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHDYERSBURG ST COM COLLEGE ANNUAL FD: $4,000 · OtherDYERSBURG ST COM COLLEGE ANNUAL FD+23 more: $8,600 · Other+23 moreRhodes College: $800 · EducationBRYAN COLLEGE: $200 · EducationCOMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $750 · HealthMID-SOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION: $700 · Arts & CulturePILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $350 · Human Services
Other$50,700Education$1,000Health$750Arts & Culture$700Human Services$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRhodes College: $800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $750 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMID-SOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRYAN COLLEGE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rhodes College ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CANCER FUND ↗
  • Who funds MID-SOUTH PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PILOTS FOR PATIENTS ↗
  • Who funds LODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRYAN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brayton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brayton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brayton Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Brayton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brayton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph