Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brandt Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$277k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$137kEducation$103kHealth$95kFood & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$8kEnvironment$4kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $272k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$45,000
ORPHANS OF THE STORM$43,500
OAKTON COLLEGE$40,000
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$35,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$35,000
HEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER$20,000
CANCER WELLNESS CENTER$15,500
PAWS CHICAGO$15,000
NORTHFIELD FOOD PANTRY$13,461
GLENBROOK HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$2,000
BROOKFIELD ZOO$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
ANTI-CRUELTY$500
HADLEY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 19 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$268k
$3k

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OO
    ORPHANS OF THE STORM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +187%
  • WR
    WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +43%
  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • PF
    PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • U
    UNICEF
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
3
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
4
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
5
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
6
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
7
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
8
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
9
Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The mission of the mspca is to protect animals, relieve their suffering, advance their health and welfare, prevent cruelty and work for a just and compassionate society.

Animals
10
Hawaiian Humane Society

The hawaiian humane society works to improve the welfare of animals through animal care, education, legislation, and prevention on the island of oahu. its mission is to promote the human-animal bond and the humane treatment of all animals.

Animals
11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Glenbrook High School Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $77,500 · AnimalsORPHANS OF THE STORMPAWS CHICAGO: $28,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGOHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP: $20,000 · AnimalsHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFPThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $7,500 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty Society+1 more: $4,000 · AnimalsOAKTON COLLEGE: $40,000 · OtherOAKTON COLLEGENORTHFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $23,461 · OtherNORTHFIELD FOOD PANTRYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $12,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT: $4,000 · OtherCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,000 · Other+9 more: $17,500 · Other+9 morePARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION I…AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIO…CANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $17,500 · HealthCANCER WELLNESS CENTERWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationWILLIAM RAINEY…HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $2,500 · EducationGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 · Food & NutritionGlenbrook High School Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Animals$137,000Other$100,961Health$87,500Education$52,500Food & Nutrition$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $77,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $28,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $17,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGlenbrook High School Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP ↗
  • Who funds CANCER WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Glenbrook High School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brandt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brandt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brandt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph