Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bramsen Charitable Foundation dated November 30 2018

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$4.5MAnimals$4.0MPhilanthropy$2.4MReligion$150kFood & Nutrition$52kEducation$9kInternational$5kArts & Culture$250
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $180k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chicago Zoological Society$2,000,000
Home Centered Care Institute$180,000
Meals on Wheels Foundation$10,000
Above and Beyond Family Recovery Center$4,000
Barrington History Museum$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Fidelity Charitable Giving Account: $2.3M → 16%The Makana North Shore Clinic: $1.0M → 9%Colorado Rocky Mountain School: $5k → 6%Little Home Church by the Wayside: $150k → 7%Above and Beyond Family Recovery Center: $4k → 14%American Academy of Home Care Medicine: $10k → 19%Above and Beyond Family Recovery Center: $4k → 14%Above and Beyond Family Recovery Center: $3k → 14%Meals on Wheels Foundation: $10k → 14%Meals on Wheels Foundation: $10k → 14%Meals on Wheels Foundation: $10k → 14%Meals on Wheels Foundation: $10k → 14%Meals on Wheels Foundation: $6k → 14%Northwestern Memorial Foundation: $100k → 14%Meals on Wheels Foundation: $6k → 14%Home Centered Care Institute: $1.5M → 14%Home Centered Care Institute: $1.5M → 14%Home Centered Care Institute: $180k → 14%Home Centered Care Institute: $119k → 14%Home Centered Care Institute: $60k → 14%Home Centered Care Institute: $35k → 14%American Friends of the Hebrew University: $1k → 14%American Friends of the Hebrew University: $1k → 14%American Friends of the Hebrew University: $1k → 14%American Friends of the Hebrew University: $1k → 14%Chicago Zoological Society: $2.0M → 14%Barrington History Museum: $250 → 14%Chicago Zoological Society: $2.0M → 14%Journey Care Foundation: $100k → 14%Exodus World Service: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 5 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$7.5M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-13%

Still filing today

80%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalAnimalsEducationReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Chicago Zoological Society
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +15%
  • HC
    HOME CENTERED CARE INSTITUTE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +95% · 55% of their budget
  • AA
    Above and Beyond Family Recovery Center NFP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FC
    Fidelity Charitable Giving Account
    one grant, 2021 · $2.3M
  • TM
    THE MAKANA NORTH SHORE CLINIC
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue -34%
  • LH
    Little Home Church by the Wayside
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
2
Trustees of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens

The broad mission of the ASCSA has remained constant over its distinguished history: teaching research archaeological exploration publication and dissemination of research. Founded in 1881 the ASCSA provides graduate students and scholars…

Arts & Culture
3
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
4
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

—
5
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
6
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
7
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
8
Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education

To serve the public interest by advancing the quality of healthcare management education by: (1) setting measurable criteria for excellent healthcare management education, (2) supporting, assisting, and advising programs which seek to meet…

Education
9
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
12
Community Health Accreditation Program Inc

Advance the highest quality of home and community-based care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/a Journeycare Foundation); the most unlike its peers is Barrington History Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOME CENTERED CARE INSTITUTE: $3,394,100 · HealthHOME CENTERED CARE INSTITUTETHE MAKANA NORTH SHORE CLINIC: $1,000,000 · HealthTHE MAKANA NORTH SHORE CLINIC+2 more: $21,000 · HealthChicago Zoological Society: $4,000,000 · AnimalsChicago Zoological SocietyFidelity Charitable Giving Account: $2,332,000 · OtherFidelity Charitable Giving…Little Home Church by the Wayside: $150,000 · OtherLittle Home Church by the …Northwestern Memorial Foundation: $100,000 · Other+1 more: $52,000 · OtherThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $100,000 · ReligionEXODUS WORLD SERVICE: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $4,000 · InternationalCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · EducationBarrington History Museum: $250 · Arts & Culture
Health$4,415,100Animals$4,000,000Other$2,634,000Religion$100,000International$9,000Education$5,000Arts & Culture$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChicago Zoological Society: $4,000,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHOME CENTERED CARE INSTITUTE: $3,394,100 over 5y, 55% of budgetTHE MAKANA NORTH SHORE CLINIC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAbove and Beyond Family Recovery Center NFP: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEXODUS WORLD SERVICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bramsen Charitable Foundation dated November 30 2018 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bramsen Charitable Foundation dated November 30 2018. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bramsen Charitable Foundation dated November 30 2018?

    Find your warmest path to Bramsen Charitable Foundation dated November 30 2018 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bramsen Charitable Foundation dated November 30 2018’s filings →

    More from the funding graph