Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brady Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$308k
Granted FY2025still arriving
119
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$369kEducation$328kHealth$200kFood & Nutrition$150kAnimals$93kRecreation & Sports$84kPublic Safety & Disaster$84kEnvironment$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 119 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k114 grants · $148k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
$500
Median grant
21
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HISTORIC CAMDEN FOUNDATION$61,300
MOUNT SOPRIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY$50,000
REGROUP WNC FUND$28,500
GULF COAST PRIMATE SANCTUARY$10,000
CATAWBA COLLEGE$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$8,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$8,000
PBS$7,500
WETA$7,500
DUKE UNIVERSITY$6,500
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP USA$5,000
THE NATIONAL STEEPLE CHASE MUSEUM$5,000
HOLLINS UNIVERSITY$5,000
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$5,000
MAKE A CHANGE WORLD INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 12%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $50 → 9%PERC INC: $250 → 9%THE CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 8%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 12%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $100 → 6%THE CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 8%WEINSTEIN HOSPICE: $100 → 13%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $2k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $400 → 15%JORDAN RIVER FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%RESPONSE: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 160 repeat orgs$343k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

160 repeat relationships: 81 still active in FY2025, 79 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

160
164

Total granted

$1.5M
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+23%

Still filing today

56%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HISTORIC CAMDEN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $198k · revenue +186%
  • OM
    OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $123k · revenue +35%
  • CC
    CATAWBA COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +383%

Funded once

  • SC
    SECOND CHANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +221%
  • AO
    AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue -7%
  • TB
    THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
11
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
12
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tetrick Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

182 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 182 of the 365 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
52
Early backer (in before they grew)
176/182
Grantees still filing
122/182
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HISTORIC CAMDEN FOUNDATION: $197,550 · OtherHISTORIC CAMDEN FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $72,275 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe 2Forks Club: $69,600 · OtherThe 2Forks ClubTHE MOUNT SOPRIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,225 · Other+137 more: $663,855 · Other+137 moreCATAWBA COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationCATAWBA COLLEGEHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $46,970 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERS…THE I AM FOUNDATION: $37,909 · EducationTHE I AM FOUNDA…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $32,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $21,800 · EducationWOODBERRY FORES…The Farm Collaborative: $14,650 · EducationThe Farm Collab…SAINT MARYS SCHOOL: $9,500 · Education+7 more: $18,350 · Education+7 moreOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $123,000 · HealthOPEN MEDI…COMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF KERSHAW: $5,750 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,500 · Health+5 more: $7,350 · HealthBELL TOWER GREEN INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $23,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC: $12,100 · Arts & CultureThe Art Base: $9,200 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $5,700 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $12,750 · Arts & CultureCITY DOGS RESCUE INC: $30,700 · AnimalsKERSHAW COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,950 · AnimalsFOSTERING FOSTER ANIMAL RESCUE: $8,200 · AnimalsSCARLET OAK FARMS INC: $7,500 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Animals+6 more: $8,500 · AnimalsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $44,500 · InternationalAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC: $11,330 · InternationalGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalTURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION (US): $2,500 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalSUSTAINABLE SETTINGS: $13,078 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · EnvironmentMAKE A CHANGE WORLD INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $3,300 · EnvironmentASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $3,250 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $3,000 · EnvironmentBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Environment
Other$1,093,505Education$241,679Health$141,600Arts & Culture$91,250Animals$79,850International$64,330Environment$36,628

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHISTORIC CAMDEN FOUNDATION: $197,550 over 5y, 15% of budgetOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $123,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetThe 2Forks Club: $69,600 over 6y, 12% of budgetCATAWBA COLLEGE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SOPRIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $46,970 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $44,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE I AM FOUNDATION: $37,909 over 3y, 100% of budgetSECOND CHANCE INC: $32,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $32,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITY DOGS RESCUE INC: $30,700 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBELL TOWER GREEN INC: $28,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $23,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $21,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Kershaw County: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKERSHAW COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,950 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCARBONDALE ARTS: $15,850 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetThe Farm Collaborative: $14,650 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSUSTAINABLE SETTINGS: $13,078 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC: $12,100 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC: $11,330 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARYS SCHOOL: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Base: $9,200 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFOSTERING FOSTER ANIMAL RESCUE: $8,200 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $7,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSCARLET OAK FARMS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetSEED PEACE: $7,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $6,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIELD SCHOOL INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF KERSHAW: $5,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $5,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL COUNTRY CLUB INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDUKE SCHOOL: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Potomac School: $4,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $3,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $3,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $3,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HISTORIC CAMDEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The 2Forks Club ↗
  • Who funds CATAWBA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SOPRIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE I AM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CITY DOGS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BELL TOWER GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Kershaw County ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CARBONDALE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds The Farm Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE SETTINGS ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARYS SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community FoundationCO47.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Alpenglow Foundation · Arches Foundation · John & Jacolyn Bucksbaum Family Found · Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation · Aspen Skiing Company Environment Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Colorado Gives Foundation · Our Part co Marsha Soffer · Nm Morris Family Foundation · The Flunison Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brady Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brady Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brady Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Brady Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 365 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brady’s filings →

More from the funding graph