Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bradberry Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$361k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$345kHousing & Shelter$228kFood & Nutrition$90kHealth$56kReligion$56kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kAnimals$32kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k13 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$300,000
BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL GARDENS$12,000
TEAM RUBICON USA$12,000
MAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE$10,000
WALTON ARTS CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FEED THE HUNGRY SMA$3,000
FEED THE HUNGRY LOS RICOS$2,000
ANIMAL LEAGUE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$2,000
AACF IN NORTHWEST ARKANSAS$2,000
FRIENDS OF CASITA LINDA AC INC$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,250
FUNDS FOR THE BIBLIOTECA PUBLICA IN$1,250
MADGALENE SERENITY HOUSE$1,124
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDRENS SHELTE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Bradberry Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in AR; by stated purpose, 82%.

Bradberry Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$296k · 3 repeat orgs$694k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +335% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
22

Total granted

$296k
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+335%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $349k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21
EducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $228k · revenue +335% · 33% of their budget
  • SP
    ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    3× · 2017–2020 · $56k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12k · revenue -64%

Funded once

  • NA
    NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    UAB-UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMIN
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • WR
    WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siempre Para Los Ninos

Serve the needs of the children of mexico

Human Services
2
Forgotten Children Ministries

Provide spiritual, physical, medical, and humanitarian aid and relief to the indigent, homesless, distressed, and underprivileged children in third world countries. specifically without limitation to the country of honduras.

Religion
3
Friends of the Children of Venezuela Inc

Provide medicine and food

Human Services
4
Mexican Christian Childrens Aid Inc

Mcca is dedicated to helping needy children through the provision of food and bibles to christian missionaries at orphanages, daycare centers, and other christian ministries that focus on the needs of children and families, so that the…

International
5
Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.

Human Services
6
Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc

Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.

Religion
7
Charity Anywhere Inc

Provide assistance to the poor and needy in central and south america. provide assistance with dental needs, housing, construction of homes, and education on malnutrition for mothers with newborn babies.

International
8
Childrens Haven International

To raise donations and support for providing housing, education, care support for children in the Reynosa Mexico area who are in need of refuge.

Human Services
9
Casa Esperanza Para Ninos

Mexico orphanage

Human Services
10
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
11
New Hope Childrens Ministries

The organization provides housing medical care education and loving support for homeless children in peru. the home is located in arequipa peru. the organization houses approximately 50 children and assists children no longer residing at…

International
12
Justice Access Support and Solutions for Health

Casa de salud provides health care services to low-income, indigent and underserved populations in new mexico. primary care, counseling, acupuncture, massage, reiki, addictions treatment, syringe exchange, medical debt management, case…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Miguel-Casa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Safety Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $300,000 · OtherFAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARYNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $60,000 · OtherNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANKST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $56,000 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHUAB-UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMIN: $45,000 · OtherUAB-UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINWASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $25,000 · Other+28 more: $197,124 · Other+28 moreMAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC: $228,000 · Housing & ShelterMAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE I…CHILDREN'S SAFETY CENTER: $20,000 · Crime & LegalFEED THE HUNGRY SAN MIGUEL INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS: $12,000 · AnimalsTEAM RUBICON INC: $12,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$683,124Housing & Shelter$228,000Crime & Legal$20,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Human Services$15,000Animals$12,000Public Safety & Disaster$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC: $228,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $60,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S SAFETY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFEED THE HUNGRY SAN MIGUEL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS: $12,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELCOMEHEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFTC INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-SOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFUNDS FOR THE BIBLIOTECA PUBLICA INC: $1,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAN MIGUEL-CASA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SAFETY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE HUNGRY SAN MIGUEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds WELCOMEHEALTH ↗
  • Who funds FTC INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FUNDS FOR THE BIBLIOTECA PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL-CASA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · The Schmieding Foundation · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Willard & Pat Walker Charitable Foundation Inc · Excellerate Foundation Charitable Support · The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International · Network for Good · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bradberry Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bradberry Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bradberry Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph