Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bradberry Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$361k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$345kHousing & Shelter$228kFood & Nutrition$90kHealth$56kReligion$56kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kAnimals$32kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k13 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$300,000
BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL GARDENS$12,000
TEAM RUBICON USA$12,000
MAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE$10,000
WALTON ARTS CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FEED THE HUNGRY SMA$3,000
ANIMAL LEAGUE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$2,000
FEED THE HUNGRY LOS RICOS$2,000
AACF IN NORTHWEST ARKANSAS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,250
FRIENDS OF CASITA LINDA AC INC$1,250
FUNDS FOR THE BIBLIOTECA PUBLICA IN$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,250
MADGALENE SERENITY HOUSE$1,124
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDRENS SHELTE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Bradberry Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in AR; read by stated purpose it is 82% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Bradberry Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$296k · 3 repeat orgs$694k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +335% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
22

Total granted

$296k
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+335%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $349k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21
EducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $228k · revenue +335% · 33% of their budget
  • SP
    ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    3× · 2017–2020 · $56k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12k · revenue -64%

Funded once

  • NA
    NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    UAB-UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMIN
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • WR
    WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siempre Para Los Ninos

Serve the needs of the children of mexico

Human Services
2
Forgotten Children Ministries

Provide spiritual, physical, medical, and humanitarian aid and relief to the indigent, homesless, distressed, and underprivileged children in third world countries. specifically without limitation to the country of honduras.

Religion
3
Friends of the Children of Venezuela Inc

Provide medicine and food

Human Services
4
Mexican Christian Childrens Aid Inc

Mcca is dedicated to helping needy children through the provision of food and bibles to christian missionaries at orphanages, daycare centers, and other christian ministries that focus on the needs of children and families, so that the…

International
5
Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.

Human Services
6
Arkansas Family Alliance F/K/a Whitsonlife Inc

Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.

Religion
7
Charity Anywhere Inc

Provide assistance to the poor and needy in central and south america. provide assistance with dental needs, housing, construction of homes, and education on malnutrition for mothers with newborn babies.

International
8
Childrens Haven International

To raise donations and support for providing housing, education, care support for children in the Reynosa Mexico area who are in need of refuge.

Human Services
9
Casa Esperanza Para Ninos

Mexico orphanage

Human Services
10
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

11
New Hope Childrens Ministries

The organization provides housing medical care education and loving support for homeless children in peru. the home is located in arequipa peru. the organization houses approximately 50 children and assists children no longer residing at…

International
12
Justice Access Support and Solutions for Health

Casa de salud provides health care services to low-income, indigent and underserved populations in new mexico. primary care, counseling, acupuncture, massage, reiki, addictions treatment, syringe exchange, medical debt management, case…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Miguel-Casa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children's Safety Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $300,000 · OtherFAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARYNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK — $60,000 · OtherNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANKST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $56,000 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHUAB-UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMIN — $45,000 · OtherUAB-UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINWASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT — $25,000 · Other+28 more — $197,124 · Other+28 moreMAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC — $228,000 · Housing & ShelterMAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE I…CHILDREN'S SAFETY CENTER — $20,000 · Crime & LegalFEED THE HUNGRY SAN MIGUEL INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS — $12,000 · AnimalsTEAM RUBICON INC — $12,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$683,124Housing & Shelter$228,000Crime & Legal$20,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Human Services$15,000Animals$12,000Public Safety & Disaster$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC — $228,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK — $60,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S SAFETY CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFEED THE HUNGRY SAN MIGUEL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS — $12,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFTC INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetWELCOMEHEALTH — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-SOUTH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFUNDS FOR THE BIBLIOTECA PUBLICA INC — $1,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAN MIGUEL-CASA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAGDALENE SERENITY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SAFETY CENTER
  • Who funds FEED THE HUNGRY SAN MIGUEL INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ANIMALS
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC
  • Who funds FTC INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds WELCOMEHEALTH
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-SOUTH INC
  • Who funds LIFE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds FUNDS FOR THE BIBLIOTECA PUBLICA INC
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL-CASA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · The Schmieding Foundation · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Willard & Pat Walker Charitable Foundation Inc · Excellerate Foundation Charitable Support · The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International · Network for Good · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bradberry Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph