Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brad & Linda Finkle Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$295k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$197kHealth$196kHuman Services$184kEmployment$108kEnvironment$85kInternational$77kFood & Nutrition$53kPhilanthropy$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES$35,000
KANSAS CITY PBS$25,000
TOURISM CARES$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$25,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
KCUR$25,000
CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL$15,000
MISERICORDIA$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY$15,000
HARVESTERS$15,000
SAFEHOME$15,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$15,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$10,000
KANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $184k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%SAFEHOME: $10k → 5%SAFEHOME: $10k → 5%SAFEHOME: $10k → 5%SAFEHOME: $10k → 5%SAFEHOME: $10k → 5%SAFEHOME: $6k → 5%SAFEHOME: $6k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Brad & Linda Finkle Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Brad & Linda Finkle Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$978k · 15 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -44% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$978k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-44%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $107k · revenue +105%
  • PT
    PUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +138%
  • SI
    SAFEHOME INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $77k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • WI
    WONDERSCOPE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
2
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
3
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
4
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
5
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
6
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

—
7
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
8
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
9
Kansas City Ballet Association

To inspire and engage through the beauty, power and passion of dance

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
11
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

—
12
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc; the most unlike its peers is Public Television 19 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES: $107,500 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICESKCUR: $78,500 · OtherKCURMISERICORDIA: $47,500 · OtherMISERICORDIAHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $36,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $50,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CIT…BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $43,000 · OtherBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITYJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $107,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVI…SAFEHOME INC: $77,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INCThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $51,500 · HealthThe Children's M…Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $50,500 · HealthRonald McDonald …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $46,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…PUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $85,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC TELEV…KANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $33,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY …OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $77,000 · EducationOPERATION …WONDERSCOPE INC: $20,000 · EducationWONDERSCOP…TOURISM CARES INC: $85,000 · EnvironmentTOURISM C…HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $53,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$362,500Human Services$184,000Health$148,000Arts & Culture$118,000Education$97,000Environment$85,000Food & Nutrition$53,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $107,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $85,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTOURISM CARES INC: $85,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $77,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $77,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $53,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $51,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $50,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $46,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $43,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWONDERSCOPE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURISM CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds WONDERSCOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oppenstein Brothers FoundationMO17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800 · V & H Charitable Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · Seaboard Foundation · Truman Heartland Community Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Greater Horizons

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brad & Linda Finkle Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brad & Linda Finkle Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brad & Linda Finkle Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph