· Private foundation
Bp Lester & Regina John Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $823k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST MARY'S ACADEMY | $140,000 |
| BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY | $125,000 |
| LA SALLE CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPARATORY | $122,600 |
| CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $110,000 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL - PORTLAND COUNCIL | $100,000 |
| SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY | $75,000 |
| PROJECT LEMONADE | $57,000 |
| DE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $51,000 |
| ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL | $51,000 |
| OREGON FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $50,000 |
| OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CATHOLIC CHURCH | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $50,000 |
| ROSE HAVEN CIC | $50,000 |
| VALLEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $43,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
131 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY7× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue +215%
OREGON FOOD BANK7× · 2019–2025 · $340k · revenue +50%
PROJECT LEMONADE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $268k · revenue +135%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONone grant, 2024 · $35k
- HFHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $25k
- SHSACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…
Helping kids be kids, and supporting families when they need us most. morrison serves over 8,000 youth and families annually through ten distinct programs designed to meet the needs of our clients.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Youth progress is a nonprofit organization that is licensed as a child caring agency (cca) to serve youth ages 12-25 in the custody of the oregon youth authority (oya) or the oregon department of human services (dhs). youth progress uses…
Building brighter futures with children and families.
To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeworks Nw and the most unlike its peers is Gearhart Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LEMONADE INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF PORTLAND OREGON ↗
- Who funds Oregon Community Warehouse Inc ↗
- Who funds PARKER BOUNDS JOHNSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Mariposa DR Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds STORE TO DOOR ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
- Who funds MACDONALD CENTER ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds THE NORTHWEST CATHOLIC COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds TARAHUMARA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FUND ↗
- Who funds SERENITY LANE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Clark Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · The Holzman Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Wheeler Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bp Lester & Regina John Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- LArche Portland — 59% of income from government
- Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
- Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest — 38% of income from government
- Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Safety Compass — 25% of income from government
- Oregon Community Warehouse Inc — 24% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Nami Multnomah — 16% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- The Portland Playhouse — 11% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Music Workshop — 10% of income from government
- Lifeworks Nw — 8% of income from government
- New Narrative — 6% of income from government
- Northwest Pilot Project — 6% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- University of Portland — 1% of income from government
- Gearhart Volunteer Fire Department — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Symphony Association — 0% of income from government
- The Northwest Catholic Counseling Center — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.