Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas

To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in texas; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in texas without regard to race, color, creed, or national origin; and to receive, invest, and disburse funds, and to hold property for…

$78k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2022
67%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$5k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$5,464
Largest grant, FY2024
$5,464
Organizations funded a year
3 to 10
FY2018 to FY2022
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$674k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 67% of the organizations Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas funded were first-time grantees, receiving 65% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22
Youth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$5k0%
FY20223$18k67%
FY202010$99k70%
FY20194$56k75%
FY20186$590kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$753kHuman Services$15k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of the Coastal Bend Inc: $276,442 over 1y, 19% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc: $270,617 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Beeville Inc: $36,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Austin County Inc: $23,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Brazoria County: $19,250 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Harlingen: $16,274 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas: $15,045 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Greater Dallas Inc: $14,459 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of San Antonio: $13,155 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc: $11,238 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Cooke County Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Laredo Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Austin and Travis County Inc: $9,201 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Greater Tarrant County Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys Club of Pharr: $5,774 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA33.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · The Gap Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · The Houston Food Bank · The Moody Foundation · Good360 · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas with peer funders

About Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas

How much does Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas give?
Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas reported 1 itemized grants totaling $5,464, out of $78,167 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2022.
What does Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (98%), Human Services (2%).
Who are Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Boys and Girls Clubs of the Coastal Bend Inc ($276k), Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc ($271k), Boys and Girls Club of Beeville Inc ($36k).
Does Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Boys & Girls Clubs of America, Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return), The Gap Foundation.
Where is Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas based?
Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas’ filings →

More from the funding graph