Skip to content

· Public charity

Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey Inc

To assist in the expansion and improvement of the boys and girls clubs movement in new jersey and to assist in securing support.

$318k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$3.0M
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $243,073, the rows itemized in this filing. The $318,211 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $75,138 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$21,072
Median grant
1
States reached
$699k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWARK$32,409
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOWER BERGEN COUNTY$23,909
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MONMOUTH COUNTY$21,159
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GARFIELD$21,159
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF UNION COUNTY$21,159
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON$21,072
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAWTHORNE$18,912
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATLANTIC CITY$16,659
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CAMDEN COUNTY$16,659
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HUDSON COUNTY$16,659
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY$16,659
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MERCER COUNTY$16,658
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%The various Boys: $677k → 12%The various Boys: $417k → 12%The various Boys: $403k → 12%The various Boys: $361k → 12%The various Boys: $308k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 0%.

Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 12 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$2.9M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+131%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $91k · revenue +40%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOWER BERGEN COUNTY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $78k · revenue +2%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $42k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONMOUTH COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $21k · revenue +131%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATLANTIC CITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $17k · revenue +190%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2025 · $17k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys Girls Club
—
2
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
3
Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of Georgetown

None

Youth Development
5
Boys and Girls Clubs of Binghamton

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

—
6
The Boys & Girls Clubs of Newark Charitable Fund Inc

Supporting the boys and girls club of newark, inc., as an internal revenue code 509(a) (3) organization.

—
7
Boys and Girls Club of Delaware County Inc

Provide services to children

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia Inc

To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Clubs of Cascade County

Enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens

Youth Development
10
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Billerica Inc

To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boys and Girls Club of Albany Inc

To provide a safe, fun place where youth are inspired to make healthy, responsible choices.

—
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Mercer County Inc

The organization provides educational and enrichment activities to over 1,500 youths ages 5 to 18 through year-round programs that focus on healthy lifestyles, academic success, college and career prep, and character development.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Paterson and Passaic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Clubs of Mercer County Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY INC: $2,164,860 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY INCTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC: $91,309 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NE…Boys & Girls Clubs of Union County Inc: $85,459 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs of Union …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON INC: $84,748 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HAWTHORNE INC: $82,432 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HAWTH…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOWER BERGEN COUNTY INC: $77,879 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOWER …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GARFIELD INC: $68,869 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GARFIEL…Boys & Girls Clubs of Mercer County Foundation Inc: $64,368 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs of Mercer…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HUDSON COUNTY INC: $58,064 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HUDSON…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC: $44,990 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATER…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY INC: $41,649 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GLOUCES…+2 more: $33,318 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SALVATION ARMY: $47,710 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONMOUTH COUNTY: $21,159 · Other
Human Services$2,164,860Youth Development$733,085Other$68,869

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS IN NEW JERSEY INC: $2,164,860 over 6y, 57% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC: $91,309 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Union County Inc: $85,459 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON INC: $84,748 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HAWTHORNE INC: $82,432 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOWER BERGEN COUNTY INC: $77,879 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GARFIELD INC: $68,869 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Mercer County Foundation Inc: $64,368 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HUDSON COUNTY INC: $58,064 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC: $44,990 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY INC: $41,649 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC: $16,659 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return)GA30.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · New Jersey Education Association · Pseg Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Garfield Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey Inc?

Find your warmest path to Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Boys & Girls Clubs in New Jersey’s filings →

More from the funding graph