· Public charity
Boys and Girls Club of Cheyenne Wyoming Inc
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k5 grants · $146k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $127k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHEYENNE | $126,935 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB CENTRAL WYOMING | $44,133 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SWEETWATER CO | $27,709 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DOUGLAS | $27,260 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB CAMPBELL COUNTY | $25,917 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARBON COUNTY | $21,029 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBoys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming7× · 2017–2023 · $368k · revenue +74%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SWEETWATER COUNTY7× · 2017–2023 · $184k · revenue +33%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMPBELL CO7× · 2017–2023 · $146k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST WYOMING INCone grant, 2023 · $127k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The boys & girls club's mission is to inspire and enable all youth of the northern cheyenne nation and surrounding areas to be productive citizens.
The boys & girls club of carbon county was organized to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to become productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive and caring citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
The bgcwc provides programming to more than 550 youth annually, grades k thru 12, in the areas of character, leadership, social and physical recreation, and performing better in school.
To provide behavioral guidance and promote health, sociability, education, vocation and character to the communitys youth.
Inspire and enable young people, including those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
To support the Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming through a Building Fund, Endowment Fund, and Educational Fund
The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most; to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Campbell Co and the most unlike its peers is Grace for 2 Brothers Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SWEETWATER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMPBELL CO ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CARBON CO ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST WYOMING INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Douglas ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DUBOIS ↗
- Who funds GRACE FOR 2 BROTHERS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Wyoming Governor's Residence Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boys and Girls Club of Cheyenne Wyoming Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.