Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bowsher Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$76kYouth Development$45kEducation$31kHousing & Shelter$25kPhilanthropy$17kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$2kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JAMES DAY SCHOOL$10,000
BATON ROUGE YOUTH COALITION$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUND OF TX HILL COUNTRY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%COMMUNITY FOUND OF TX HILL COUNTRY: $1k → 13%GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY: $2k → 16%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SW LA: $1k → 17%BATON ROUGE YOUTH COALITION: $10k → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION GULF: $2k → 16%BATON ROUGE YOUTH COALITION: $10k → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION GULF: $2k → 16%BATON ROUGE YOUTH COUNCIL: $10k → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION GULF: $1k → 16%CAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY: $10k → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION GULF: $1k → 16%BATON ROUGE YOUTH COALITION: $10k → 19%BATON ROUGE YOUTH COUNCIL: $10k → 19%BATON ROUGE YOUTH COUNCIL: $5k → 19%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $4k → 19%BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $2k → 19%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $1k → 19%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1k → 19%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $1k → 19%ST JAMES OF BATON ROUGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BATON ROUGE: $1k → 19%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $50k → 19%ST JAMES DAY SCHOOL: $25k → 19%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $18k → 19%ST JAMES DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 19%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 19%FRIENDS OF THE LSU ART MUSUEM: $1k → 19%LOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY: $2k → 19%LOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY: $2k → 19%BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$177k · 7 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$177k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
-12%

Still filing today

43%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Baton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +91%
  • LK
    LOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +228%
  • Teach for America Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -71%
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -2%
  • GB
    GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baton Rouge College Preparatory Inc

Baton rouge college preparatory charter school equips all students in grades five through twelve with the knowledge, skills, and character necessary to excel in college and in life.

—
2
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
3
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
4
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
5
Greater Baton Rouge Industry Alliance Inc

Drive solutions to common issues with an emphasis on workforce development and safety performance.

—
6
West Baton Rouge Chamber of Commerce

The purpose of the chamber is to initiate, stimulate and sustain planned business and residential growth and to contribute to an environment conducive to a superior quality of life for the citizens of west baton rouge parish and to engage…

—
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

—
9
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
10
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
11
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
12
Mid City Redevelopment Alliance

Mid-city redevelopment alliance is a chartered member of the neighborworks america network of excellence. the 250-member network operates using best practices that ensure strong business operations, organized and strategic data management,…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Baton Rouge Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Baton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $75,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCHST JAMES DAY SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherST JAMES DAY SCHOOLBATON ROUGE YOUTH COUNCIL: $25,000 · OtherBATON ROUGE YOUTH COUNCILPLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION GULF: $6,000 · Other+6 more: $7,000 · OtherBaton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBaton Rouge You…ST JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterST JAMES PLA…CAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $4,500 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyLOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY: $4,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $2,000 · Education
Other$148,000Youth Development$30,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Philanthropy$16,500Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetST JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Merice Boo Johnston Grigsby FoundationLA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Merice Boo Johnston Grigsby Foundation · The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · Irene W & Cb Pennington Private Foundation · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bowsher Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bowsher Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bowsher’s filings →

    More from the funding graph