Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bonnaroo Works Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$937kPhilanthropy$826kYouth Development$135kArts & Culture$55kPublic Safety & Disaster$51kEnvironment$41kFood & Nutrition$26kCivil Rights$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOTPRINT PROJECT$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EAT FOR EQUITY: $22k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
NM
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 18 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
22

Total granted

$1.2M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+7%

Still filing today

56%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WD
    WELL DUNN
    5× · 2019–2024 · $135k · revenue +13% · 36% of their budget
  • FP
    FOOTPRINT PROJECT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +274%
  • BE
    BIG EARS FESTIVAL
    4× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • WA
    We Are Neutral Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • EF
    EAT FOR EQUITY
    one grant, 2024 · $22k · revenue 0%
  • WA
    WE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Well Coffeehouse

To support our purpose to love coffee and love people even more, the well coffeehouse changes lives locally and globally through the coffee it serves and the community it creates locally and the profit it donates to bring clean water…

Community Improvement
2
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
3
Nashville Technology Council

Ntc mission is to advance the diverse technology ecosystem by connecting and promoting members, attracting, growing and retaining tech talent, and providing opportunities to reinvest in the greater nashville community.

Community Improvement
4
Tennessee Performing Arts Center (Tpac) Management Corporation

To provide facilities, services, and programs of the highest quality for the greatest benefit of the people, institutions, and communities of the state, and to take a leadership role in fostering the performing arts, arts education,…

Arts & Culture
5
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
6
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
7
Zero Foodprint

Zero foodprint is mobilizing the food world around agricultural climate solutions. our work aims to create a circular economy that incentivizes practices that actively draw down carbon dioxide and offer our best hope of addressing the…

Food & Nutrition
8
Reverb Inc

Deeply rooted within the music and environmental communities, reverb educates and engages musicians and their fans to take action toward a more sustainable future.

Environment
9
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
10
Tennessee Performing Arts Foundation

This organization may fundraise and is responsible for managing the tennessee performing arts center endowment in order to provide income to help defray operating costs of the tennessee performing arts center.

Arts & Culture
11
Arts and Business Council of Greater Nashville Inc

Arts & business council of greater nashville supports and promotes the arts by driving collaboration between arts and business that contribute to the creativity, vitality, and prosperity of greater nashville/the regions/the city.

Crime & Legal
12
Nashville Blues and Roots Alliance
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc and the most unlike its peers is We Are Neutral Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FUND OF MIDDLE TN — $715,476 · OtherCOMMUNITY FUND OF MIDDLE TNARTS OF THE AIRPORT FOUNDATION — $87,200 · OtherARTS OF THE AIRPORT FOUNDATIONMANCHESTER COFFEE COUNTY CONFERENCE CENTER — $38,000 · Other+29 more — $177,870 · Other+29 moreTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $826,067 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE…WELL DUNN — $135,000 · Education+1 more — $3,000 · EducationFOOTPRINT PROJECT — $51,437 · Public Safety & DisasterBIG EARS FESTIVAL — $30,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC TENNESSEE THEATRE FOUNDATION — $7,026 · Arts & CultureWe Are Neutral Inc — $30,000 · EnvironmentHEAD COUNT INC — $12,500 · Civil RightsWE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,018,546Philanthropy$826,067Education$138,000Public Safety & Disaster$51,437Arts & Culture$37,026Environment$30,000Civil Rights$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $826,067 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWELL DUNN — $135,000 over 5y, 36% of budgetFOOTPRINT PROJECT — $51,437 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBIG EARS FESTIVAL — $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWe Are Neutral Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEAT FOR EQUITY — $22,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetMANCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $20,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetHEAD COUNT INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIJOU THEATRE CENTER — $7,037 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHISTORIC TENNESSEE THEATRE FOUNDATION — $7,026 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOFFEE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $6,375 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetGRUNDY COUNTY FOOD BANK — $3,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTWLOHA INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Education Center — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSportsmen & Professional Men of Coffee County Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTJ MARTELL FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC
  • Who funds WELL DUNN
  • Who funds FOOTPRINT PROJECT
  • Who funds BIG EARS FESTIVAL
  • Who funds We Are Neutral Inc
  • Who funds EAT FOR EQUITY
  • Who funds MANCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds HEAD COUNT INC
  • Who funds WE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC
  • Who funds BIJOU THEATRE CENTER
  • Who funds HISTORIC TENNESSEE THEATRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COFFEE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds GRUNDY COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds TWLOHA INC
  • Who funds Global Education Center
  • Who funds Sportsmen & Professional Men of Coffee County Inc
  • Who funds TJ MARTELL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bonnaroo Works Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bonnaroo Works Fund?

Find your warmest path to Bonnaroo Works Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph