Skip to content

· Public charity

Bold Education Fund Inc

Promoting interest in and encouraging dialogue of the public at large related to property rights and protecting land and water

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$60kReligion$50kEnvironment$30kArts & Culture$27kPublic Benefit$15kCrime & Legal$10kHousing & Shelter$10kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $172,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $200,184 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,184 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$802k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAKOTA RURAL ACTION$60,000
FAITH IN PLACE$50,000
LUX ARTS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
HOLLAND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
BLACK MEN UNITED$10,000
LINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLACK MEN UNITED: $10k → 12%LUX ARTS: $20k → 13%PONCA NATION: $15k → 16%FAITH IN PLACE: $50k → 14%DAKOTA RURAL ACTION: $60k → 13%HOLLAND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%LINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL: $7k → 13%NEBRASKA LEGAL FUND: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
350 Wisconsin Action Inc

350 Wisconsin Action mobilizes concerned climate voters to push for bold climate action from government and elected officials. We keep the climate crisis at the center of the political conversation, and push for progressive policies that…

Environment
2
Art for Resistance Through Change

Raise awareness of social justice

Arts & Culture
3
Lux Art Institute

The Institute supports artists in development of new projects through a residency program and shares their discoveries with scholars, art patrons, and regional and national audience. The Institute also educates and engages the community to…

—
4
Flux Foundation

The mission of the Flux Foundation is to engage people in large-scale public art as a catalyst for education, empowerment, and collaboration.

Arts & Culture
5
4A American Alliance of Artists and Audiences Inc
Arts & Culture
6
350 Vermont Inc

350 vermont is building a people-powered and people-led climate justice movement in vermont for a just, thriving world. we are guided by the voices, experiences, and solutions of those most impacted by the global climate crisis.

Environment
7
The Luminary Inc

The luminary is a nonprofit art space in st. louis that supports artists and the community through exhibitions, residencies, grants, and public programs. we provide time, space, and resources for creative work and create opportunities for…

Arts & Culture
8
Art Start

The mission of ArtStart, founded in 1988, has remained constant over its 36-year history: to foster artistic creativity and illuminate the connections among people, ideas, and the environment. Our artists engage children, families, and…

—
9
Madison Art Gallery
—
10
Superior Arts Institute

To provide community outreach and development through the arts for educational and charitable purposes.

Arts & Culture
11
350 Colorado

We are a grassroots movement working to build a fossil-free future powered by 100% renewable energy. we empower communities across colorado to join together to fight for environmental justice. through our volunteer-led teams, we use a…

Environment
12
Kaufman Arts District Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 350 Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Holland Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dakota Rural Action: $60,000 · EducationDakota Rural ActionFAITH IN PLACE: $50,000 · ReligionFAITH IN PLACEIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual gran…NEBRASKA LEGAL FUND: $10,000 · OtherNEBRASKA LEGAL …LINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL: $7,000 · OtherLINCOLN ARTS CO…350 WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 · Environment350 WISCONSIN …LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $20,000 · Arts & CultureLUX CENTE…Our Revolution: $15,000 · Civil RightsBLACK MEN UNITED: $10,000 · Social ScienceTHE HOLLAND FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$60,000Religion$50,000Other$32,000Environment$30,000Arts & Culture$20,000Civil Rights$15,000Social Science$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDakota Rural Action: $60,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFAITH IN PLACE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget350 WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetOur Revolution: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBLACK MEN UNITED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HOLLAND FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL: $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bold Education Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bold Education Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bold Education Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bold Education Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bold Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph