Skip to content

· Private foundation

Boand Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$159k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$665kPhilanthropy$456kHealth$145kYouth Development$141kHuman Services$133kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$18,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY$30,000
FISHLINE$23,100
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HUNTINGTON VALLEY$18,000
CARMEL CARES$17,700
PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE$17,700
RANCHO CIELO$17,700
DREAM CATCHERSASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF HUNTINGTON BEACH$15,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $30k → 10%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$894k · 12 repeat orgs$348k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$894k
$348k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $207k · revenue +4%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley
    7× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +74%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY
    4× · 2017–2021 · $54k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MC
    MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY COMMUNITY FUND (PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE)
    one grant, 2017 · $300k
  • OM
    OC MEMORIAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • BI
    BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA - ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mendocino Coast Humane Society

Caring for homeless animals, and finding homes for them through pet adoptions.

Animals
2
Rancho Coastal Humane Society

See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…

Animals
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
5
California Hotel & Lodging Association

CH&LA operate to protect the right and interest of the California lodging industry. Legislative advocacy, educational training, communication, and cost-savings programs are provided for all segments of the industry. In addition, CH&LA…

—
6
Pomona Community Health Center

Pomona community health center's mission is to be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health
7
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
8
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

Community hospital of the monterey peninsula is dedicated to identifying and meeting the changing healthcare needs of the people of the monterey peninsula and surrounding communities.we are committed to providing high-quality services at a…

Health
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
11
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rancho Cielo Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peace of Mind Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY COMMUNITY FUND (PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE): $300,000 · OtherMONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY COMMUNITY FUND (PEACE OF MIND…FISHLINE: $123,100 · OtherFISHLINEIndividual grant recipient: $113,870 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDREAM CATCHERSASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: $94,100 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF HUNTINGTON BEACHORANGE COAST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherORANGE COAST MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONCARMEL CARES: $38,000 · Other+4 more: $48,900 · Other+4 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $411,204 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MON…KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $207,170 · AnimalsKITSAP HUMANE SO…PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $34,533 · AnimalsPEACE OF MIND DO…Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley: $106,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and …RANCHO CIELO INC: $34,533 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CI…PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $53,700 · HealthBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $43,000 · Human Services
Other$762,970Philanthropy$411,204Animals$241,703Youth Development$140,533Health$53,700Human Services$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $411,204 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $207,170 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley: $106,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $53,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $43,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARMEL CARES: $38,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $34,533 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $34,533 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
  • Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CARMEL CARES ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Boand Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boand Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Boand Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph