· Private foundation
BMD Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k32 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The University of Akron Foundation | $43,750 |
| Meridian Health Care | $10,000 |
| American Red Cross | $10,000 |
| NCH | $10,000 |
| IAPBC | $9,500 |
| Akron Soul Train | $5,000 |
| American Heart Association | $5,000 |
| Ohio Council for Home Care Hospice | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Marketplace Solutions | $5,000 |
| Greater Akron Chamber | $3,500 |
| The University of Akron | $3,500 |
| GPD Group Employees Foundation | $3,000 |
| Akron Bar Association Foundation | $3,000 |
| American Cancer Society | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $81k · revenue +30%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +25%
- ASAKRON SOUL TRAIN3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- JBJULIE BILLIART SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $5k
- FEFlorida East Coast Railway Santa Trone grant, 2022 · $5k
- HAHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTERone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
To enhance the quality of law and justice through community service and to maintain the integrity of the profession.
The mission of leadership akron is to inspire, strengthen, and empower leaders. our purpose is to unlock the potential of leaders and serve as a catalyst that drives them to create a greater akron.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.
The akron development corporation was organized to support economic development initiatives in the city of akron, particularly through the former akron global business accelerator and to secure state of ohio funding for technology-based…
Akron roundtable brings speakers to akron who inform, educate and stimulate listeners on topics of importance to the region, the country and the world.
We create connections, empowering everyone in the autism community with the resources needed to live fully.
The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Legal Aid Services and the most unlike its peers is Gpd Group Employees Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds AKRON SOUL TRAIN ↗
- Who funds AKRON BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHAIR-ITY ↗
- Who funds GPD GROUP EMPLOYEES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF AKRON OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Marketplace Solutions Inc ↗
- Who funds Revere Schools Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOAP BOX DERBY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON ↗
- Who funds GREATER AKRON CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds Summit Choral Society Inc ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds A KID AGAIN INC ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AKRON ART MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · Gar Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Firstenergy Foundation · W Paul Mills & Thora J Mills Memorial · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · Synthomer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization BMD Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Operation New Hope Inc — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to BMD Foundation?
Find your warmest path to BMD Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.